Aller au contenu principal

L’analytique est activée par défaut pour améliorer Otranspo. Vous pouvez la désactiver ici.

EN

Stittsville

Tanya Hein

A répondu sur le fondAucun délai compté

L’échange

Les messages publiés et les réponses retenues suivent l’ordre de leur envoi ou réception. La date de première publication figure séparément dans chaque document.

  1. Courriel envoyé

    Otranspo · Envoyé ou reçu · Première publication

    Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Dear Tanya Hein,

    I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here is the live transit scorecard for Stittsville: https://otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/6. Right now it shows 72.8% of arrivals landing within five minutes of schedule, graded route by route from OC Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, next to a live map of the vehicles running through the ward and a plain list of what would fix the worst of it. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings attached.

    Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's all in the City's own contract disclosures:

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf

    The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders.

    Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced rider surveys.

    Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at https://otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City nothing.

    Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that it works.

    So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected:

    1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and performance, before it gets extended again.

    2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology going forward.

    3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back with the City.

    I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes to show you or your team the platform.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Vérifier ce dossier

    État de publication: Publié intégralement

    La source conservée correspond à l’empreinte calculée lors de l’ingestion.

    Empreinte SHA-256 ef526aba08eb2915018b3f654a99641d87342574fad0ee722cf81f2f887914d8

    Lien vers ce message

  2. Courriel de réponse

    Écrit par la personne · Envoyé ou reçu · Première publication

    Re: Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Hi Wyatt, Thanks for reaching out and for the detailed information. I'd love to see your platform. I think I am the most qualified candidate in Ward 6 but if the voters decide otherwise, I will still be advocating on transit matters. Call me about scheduling a time. Greater financial transparency and procurement process reform are high on my list of priorities in a way that would allow me to support your first two requests. These are exactly the opportunities to find efficiencies that the city should be actively pursuing. As for the third, I like the idea and how it promotes taxpayer savings, broader access to (much-needed) information, but would want to further investigate potential issues such as the impact of diverting riders away from direct city channels, how quickly/thoroughly information would be updated, how tech or other failures might be handled, whether there are any accessibility concerns, and risks related to future commercialization, advertising, etc. before making a full commitment. Thanks kindly, Tanya Hein 343-202-8261 On 2026-09-09 21:46, Wyatt Baldwin · otranspo.ca wrote: > Dear Tanya Hein, > > I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of > otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before > anything else, here is the live transit scorecard for Stittsville: > otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/6. [1] Right now it shows 72.8% of arrivals > landing within five minutes of schedule, graded route by route from OC > Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, next to a > live map of the vehicles running through the ward and a plain list of > what would fix the worst of it. Use it at the doors and in debates, no > strings attached. > > Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to > $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one > contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, > $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 > in 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all > sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never > went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. > It's all in the City's own contract disclosures: > > Transit contracts awarded under delegated authority (PDF) [2] > > Contracts under delegation of authority, January 1 to June 30, 2025 > (PDF) [3] > > The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a > subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual > one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised > price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions > in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually > bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 > payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile > crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders. > > Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau > launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president > said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an > agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: Le > Droit report [4]). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the > quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, > and buying crowdsourced rider surveys. > > Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent > scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider > reports at otranspo.ca/en/report [5] where riders log the no-show > buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and > live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, > and it costs the City nothing. > > Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost > is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be > told that it works. > > So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected: > > 1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app > contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and > performance, before it gets extended again. > > 2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit > technology going forward. > > 3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, > mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced > data back with the City. > > I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance > voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 > minutes to show you or your team the platform. > > Respectfully, > Wyatt Baldwin > otranspo.ca Links: ------ [1] https://otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/6. [2] https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf [3] https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf [4] https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e [5] https://otranspo.ca/en/report

    Vérifier ce dossier

    État de publication: Publié intégralement

    La source conservée correspond à l’empreinte calculée lors de l’ingestion.

    Empreinte SHA-256 eaf2e58ac6cfb6ddbde9cec440db7dd03f37e0e3058004a80f05471306774f66

    Lien vers ce message

  3. Courriel envoyé

    Otranspo · Envoyé ou reçu · Première publication

    A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Dear Tanya Hein,

    Thank you for replying on September 10. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you.

    My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract

    You asked me to call about a time to see the platform, and I haven't. I'm not going to squeeze it into the last four weeks of your campaign; advance voting is about to start and your time belongs to voters right now. After election day on October 26 the offer stands, elected or not, and I'll write to you then to find a time.

    As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, with my letter beside it. Yours is on file. If you'd rather your position were summarised than quoted, tell me by Wednesday, September 30 and I'll publish it without your words and note that you asked.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Vérifier ce dossier

    État de publication: Publié intégralement

    La source conservée correspond à l’empreinte calculée lors de l’ingestion.

    Empreinte SHA-256 10ca5a1aba631aa9c85db1d07e90e55aa376ed02834859c0767c136fe2314856

    Lien vers ce message

Chronologie de livraison et de réponse

État de livraison du courriel
Envoyé; livraison non confirmée
État consigné
9 septembre 2026 à 21 h 46 HAE
  1. Envoyé; livraison non confirmée
  2. Courriel envoyé · Otranspo
  3. Courriel de réponse · Écrit par la personne
  4. Envoyé; livraison non confirmée
  5. Courriel envoyé · Otranspo

Les trois demandes

La lecture ci-dessous est la nôtre, et non une citation. Les mots de la personne figurent plus bas, et vous pouvez juger vous-même.

1 Examen du contrat
S’engageSaid financial transparency and procurement reform are priorities that let her support the first two asks.
2 Approvisionnement ouvert
S’engageSaid financial transparency and procurement reform are priorities that let her support the first two asks.
3 Intégration ouverte
S’engage en partieSupports the idea but explicitly withheld a full commitment pending named questions about accessibility, data freshness, failure handling and future commercialisation.

Modifications de cette page

  • 28 septembre 2026Publication decision recorded 28 September 2026: the reply is published verbatim, released together with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa, the day advance voting starts, as the letter of 9 September said.État de publication modifié: En attente de révision éditoriale à Publié intégralementMessage concerné

Si votre entrée figure ici

Chaque entrée reste ouverte. Une réponse qui arrive dans plusieurs mois sera publiée et la page indiquera qu’elle est arrivée après la publication, avec les deux dates. Si quelque chose est inexact, écrivez-nous et la correction est publiée avec ce qui a changé et quand. Si vous avez répondu et préférez que vos mots ne soient pas imprimés, dites-le: nous publierons votre position sans votre texte, et nous consignerons votre demande.

Nous écrire