Skip to main content

Usage analytics is on by default to improve Otranspo. You can turn it off here.

FR

Gloucester-Southgate

Jessica Bradley

Replied, took no positionNo time counted

A person wrote back. The reply did not commit to any of the three asks, so the answer clock is still running.

The correspondence

Published messages and withheld-reply notices follow the order sent or received. Each document shows its first publication date separately.

  1. Email we sent

    Otranspo · Sent or received · First published

    The $700K Transit app deal council never voted on, and an Ottawa-built alternative

    Dear Councillor Bradley,

    I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. I'm writing because you're both a sitting Member of Council and a candidate in October's election.

    First, in transparency: because part of what I'm asking for could benefit my platform, I wrote to the City's Integrity Commissioner before sending this and asked whether it counts as lobbying. Her office advised that pre-registration is not required and asked me to report back once I had made contact. I am sending her office a copy of these communications, and I will register in the Lobbyist Registry if her office determines that registration applies. Doing things the right way is the whole reason otranspo.ca exists.

    Here is what I want you to know. Since June 2023, the City has committed close to $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in 2025 for crowdsourced rider surveys through its Rate-My-Ride feature. There was no RFP, it was all sole-sourced under Section 22(1)(d) of the Procurement By-law, and it never came to you for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's all in the City's own contract disclosures:

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf

    The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders.

    Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced rider surveys.

    Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at https://otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City nothing.

    Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system, a fully grade-separated O-Train spine and one of the most extensive bus rapid transit networks on the continent. What we've lost is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that it works.

    So I'm asking you to commit to three things:

    1. Support a public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and performance, before it is extended again.

    2. Commit to fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology going forward.

    3. Support an open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back with the City, at a fraction of what we commit now.

    I'm publishing every candidate's position on otranspo.ca before advance voting starts October 1. I'd welcome 15 minutes to show you or your staff the platform, starting with the live scorecard for Gloucester-Southgate: https://otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/10

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 e587b6c2e30d7e25ce3e17deebb9226f80a60d0cd4793f6bd6c894e25719cfa2

    Link to this message

  2. Email we sent

    Otranspo · Sent or received · First published

    A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Dear Councillor Bradley,

    I wrote to you on September 9 about the City's Transit app contract. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you.

    My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract

    In that letter I also offered 15 minutes to show you the platform. I'm holding that until after election day. With advance voting about to start, the last four weeks of a campaign are not the time for me to be asking for yours. After October 26 the offer stands for anyone who wants it, elected or not, and I'll write again then.

    As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, and the page records who answered and who didn't. If you want your position on the record, a reply by Wednesday, September 30 is all it takes; the three asks are unchanged.

    As with my first letter, a copy of this note goes to the Integrity Commissioner's office.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 a7c4827cbff3b10bc2062730eac056a53933d1a471812e813d35cafe8c56fb29

    Link to this message

  3. Reply email

    Written by them · Sent or received · First published

    Re: A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Hi Wyatt, Thanks for reaching back out. As you mentioned, capacity is a bit of an issue right now, and I'm unable to complete all of the surveys and questionnaires that come in. I appreciate the understanding that you shared. If you did want to reach back out after the election to share your platform, perhaps we can find a time for you to meet with my team (of course all dependent on if we are successful come October 26th!). If interested, please feel free to reach out at that time to my City Hall email jessica.bradley@ottawa.ca . Thank you for the work and advocacy you are doing to improve communication around transit. Jessica ________________________________ From: Wyatt Baldwin · otranspo.ca <hello@otranspo.ca> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2026 5:45 PM To: Jessica Bradley <jessica@bradley2026.ca> Subject: A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered Dear Councillor Bradley, I wrote to you on September 9 about the City's Transit app contract. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you. My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract In that letter I also offered 15 minutes to show you the platform. I'm holding that until after election day. With advance voting about to start, the last four weeks of a campaign are not the time for me to be asking for yours. After October 26 the offer stands for anyone who wants it, elected or not, and I'll write again then. As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, and the page records who answered and who didn't. If you want your position on the record, a reply by Wednesday, September 30 is all it takes; the three asks are unchanged. As with my first letter, a copy of this note goes to the Integrity Commissioner's office. Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 ee02ce33a596df55cf70b1f963fc234ce0d96f7925cbd1ece4e7e44945b5168c

    Link to this message

Delivery and reply timeline

Mail delivery state
Sent; delivery unconfirmed
State recorded
September 9, 2026 at 9:55 p.m. EDT
  1. Sent; delivery unconfirmed
  2. Email we sent · Otranspo
  3. Sent; delivery unconfirmed
  4. Email we sent · Otranspo
  5. Reply email · Written by them

The three things we asked for

The reading below is ours, not a quotation. Their own words are further down, and you can judge for yourself.

1 Contract review
No position on record
2 Open procurement
No position on record
3 Open integration
No position on record

Changes to this page

  • September 30, 2026Publication decision recorded 30 September 2026: the reply is published verbatim, released together with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa, the day advance voting starts, as the letter of 9 September said.Publication state changed: Pending editorial review to Published verbatimAffected message

If your entry is here

Every entry stays open. A reply that arrives months from now is published and the page says it arrived after publication, with both dates. If anything here is wrong, write to us and the correction is published with what changed and when. If you replied and would rather your words were not printed, say so and we will publish your position without your text, and record that you asked.

Write to us