본문으로 건너뛰기

운행

문제 신고

이 페이지는 특정 정류장, 노선, 역, 차량에 대한 것이 아니에요. 하나를 열면 신고에 그 이름이 들어가요. 또는 전체 신고를 이용하세요.

무슨 일이 있었나요
전체 신고 내용 계정이 필요 없어요

Rideau-Rockcliffe

Peter J. Karwacki

답변 완료집계된 시간 없음

주고받은 서신

공개된 메시지와 보류된 답변 알림은 보내거나 받은 순서대로 나열합니다. 각 문서에는 최초 공개 날짜가 따로 표시됩니다.

  1. 우리가 보낸 이메일

    Otranspo · 보냄 또는 받음 · 최초 게시일

    Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Dear Peter J. Karwacki,

    I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here is the live transit scorecard for Rideau-Rockcliffe: https://otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/13. Right now it shows 66.5% of arrivals landing within five minutes of schedule, graded route by route from OC Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, next to a live map of the vehicles running through the ward and a plain list of what would fix the worst of it. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings attached.

    Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's all in the City's own contract disclosures:

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf

    The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders.

    Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced rider surveys.

    Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at https://otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City nothing.

    Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that it works.

    So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected:

    1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and performance, before it gets extended again.

    2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology going forward.

    3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back with the City.

    I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes to show you or your team the platform.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    이 기록 확인하기

    게시 상태: 원문 그대로 게시됨

    저장된 원본이 수집 해시와 일치합니다.

    SHA-256 체크섬 7205f53083c1261361a95994a3719ef175756f50d3f56c9ea3054e1304a7aa81

    이 메시지 링크

  2. 회신 이메일

    상대방이 작성 · 보냄 또는 받음 · 최초 게시일

    Re: Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Dear Wyatt, Thanks for writing, and for doing this the right way — sourced, dated, with the actual contract disclosures attached rather than just an accusation. That's rare, and it's exactly the kind of documentation I try to build my own posts around. On the substance: yes to all three, and I'll explain why rather than just checking boxes. On #1, a public Transit Commission review of contract 33523-92002-G01 before any extension: this is squarely the kind of thing that should never have avoided a council vote in the first place. A sole-source exception used once is a judgment call. Three sole-source payments to the same vendor over three years, totalling close to $700,000, with no public term or per-rider pricing attached to any of them, isn't an exception anymore, it's a pattern that delegated authority was never supposed to cover. I don't need to take your word for the STO comparison either — the fact that a neighbouring agency got the same core product for nothing is exactly the kind of baseline that should have been in front of whoever signed off on the Royale rollout. I'll commit to pushing for that review, and to asking publicly what the $180,000 actually bought: one year, multiple years, a flat fee, or something priced per subscriber. On #2, open and competitive processes for rider-facing transit tech going forward: agreed without qualification. This is the same argument I've made about 311 — the City keeps treating its own resident-facing data infrastructure as a one-off purchase instead of a piece of civic infrastructure that should be competitively and transparently sourced, then held to a measurable standard afterward. A subscription nobody can price is an output, not an outcome. On #3, an open partnership framework so platforms like yours can integrate and share data back with the City: I support the principle, and I'd want it built as an actual framework with clear technical and data-governance criteria, not a handshake deal with one vendor replacing another. The problem with 33523-92002-G01 wasn't that a private company was involved, it was that the terms were never public and never competed. Whatever comes next has to be open by design, or we've just moved the same failure mode onto a different platform. I'd take you up on the 15 minutes to see otranspo.ca directly, and I'll have a proper answer up before October 1st. In the meantime: yes, yes, and yes-with-the-framework-built-right. Sincerely, Peter Karwacki On Wed, Sep 9, 2026, 10:00 p.m. Wyatt Baldwin · otranspo.ca < hello@otranspo.ca> wrote: > Dear Peter J. Karwacki, > > I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, > an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here > is the live transit scorecard for Rideau-Rockcliffe: > otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/13. Right now it shows 66.5% of arrivals > landing within five minutes of schedule, graded route by route from OC > Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, next to a live > map of the vehicles running through the ward and a plain list of what would > fix the worst of it. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings > attached. > > Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to > $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one > contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, > $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in > 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all > sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never > went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's > all in the City's own contract disclosures: > > Transit contracts awarded under delegated authority (PDF) > <https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf> > > Contracts under delegation of authority, January 1 to June 30, 2025 (PDF) > <https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf> > > The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a > subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, > and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of > $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of > a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the > term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the > City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from > Ottawa's own riders. > > Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau > launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said > publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's > buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: Le Droit report > <https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e>). > What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's > own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced > rider surveys. > > Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent > scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at > otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and > breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with > real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City > nothing. > > Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is > trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that > it works. > > So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected: > > 1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app > contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and > performance, before it gets extended again. > > 2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology > going forward. > > 3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine > included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back > with the City. > > I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance > voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes > to show you or your team the platform. > > Respectfully, > Wyatt Baldwin > otranspo.ca >

    이 기록 확인하기

    게시 상태: 원문 그대로 게시됨

    저장된 원본이 수집 해시와 일치합니다.

    SHA-256 체크섬 8a04bd3c64b91aa6a7a9218195f3cfbcd11e0461e1a48a3a80641e310a889332

    이 메시지 링크

  3. 우리가 보낸 이메일

    Otranspo · 보냄 또는 받음 · 최초 게시일

    A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Dear Peter J. Karwacki,

    Thank you for replying on September 10. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you.

    My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract

    You said yes to the 15 minutes I offered, and I haven't booked it. I'm not going to squeeze it into the last four weeks of your campaign; advance voting is about to start and your time belongs to voters right now. After election day on October 26 the offer stands, elected or not, and I'll write to you then to find a time.

    As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, with my letter beside it. Yours is on file. If you'd rather your position were summarised than quoted, tell me by Wednesday, September 30 and I'll publish it without your words and note that you asked.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    이 기록 확인하기

    게시 상태: 원문 그대로 게시됨

    저장된 원본이 수집 해시와 일치합니다.

    SHA-256 체크섬 7cf6ff5bd823fbcea56debae9b9bb93852b57f21ba12a319ec3b3c103b72c30e

    이 메시지 링크

  4. 회신 이메일

    상대방이 작성 · 보냄 또는 받음 · 최초 게시일

    Re: A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Voter engagement in Rideau Rockcliffe, home of the PM and governor general is very low. Peter On Mon, Sep 28, 2026, 11:51 p.m. Wyatt Baldwin · otranspo.ca < hello@otranspo.ca> wrote: > Dear Peter J. Karwacki, > > Thank you for replying on September 10. Two things since, and one of them > is a correction I owe you. > > My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract > (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I > left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 > extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus > customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna > Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and > asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The > corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the > contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract > > You said yes to the 15 minutes I offered, and I haven't booked it. I'm not > going to squeeze it into the last four weeks of your campaign; advance > voting is about to start and your time belongs to voters right now. After > election day on October 26 the offer stands, elected or not, and I'll write > to you then to find a time. > > As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at > https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October > 1, the day advance voting starts, with my letter beside it. Yours is on > file. If you'd rather your position were summarised than quoted, tell me by > Wednesday, September 30 and I'll publish it without your words and note > that you asked. > > Respectfully, > Wyatt Baldwin > otranspo.ca >

    이 기록 확인하기

    게시 상태: 원문 그대로 게시됨

    저장된 원본이 수집 해시와 일치합니다.

    SHA-256 체크섬 cdac9bbe0b2963cffee2174d1c7acd0430dec5e34978c7f69d72e11686b048c0

    이 메시지 링크

전달 및 답변 일정

우편 발송 상태
발송됨, 수신 확인 안 됨
기록된 상태
2026년 9월 9일 오후 10:00 GMT-4
  1. 발송됨, 수신 확인 안 됨
  2. 우리가 보낸 이메일 · Otranspo
  3. 회신 이메일 · 상대방이 작성
  4. 발송됨, 수신 확인 안 됨
  5. 우리가 보낸 이메일 · Otranspo
  6. 회신 이메일 · 상대방이 작성

우리가 요청한 세 가지

아래 해석은 저희의 해석이며 인용이 아닙니다. 후보자의 직접 발언은 더 아래에 있으니 직접 판단해 보세요.

1 계약 검토
약속함Committed, and argued the case: three sole-source payments to one vendor over three years is a pattern rather than an exception.
2 공개 조달
약속함Committed without conditions.
3 연동 열기
약속함Committed without conditions.

이 페이지의 변경 내용

  • 2026년 9월 30일Publication decision recorded 30 September 2026: the reply is published verbatim, released together with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa, the day advance voting starts, as the letter of 9 September said.공개 상태가 변경되었습니다: 편집 검토 대기 중 to 원문 그대로 게시됨영향받은 메시지
  • 2026년 9월 28일Publication decision recorded 28 September 2026: the reply is published verbatim, released together with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa, the day advance voting starts, as the letter of 9 September said.공개 상태가 변경되었습니다: 편집 검토 대기 중 to 원문 그대로 게시됨영향받은 메시지

본인의 항목이 여기에 있다면

모든 항목은 계속 열려 있습니다. 몇 달 뒤에 도착한 답변도 게시되며, 페이지에 게시 후에 도착했다고 두 날짜와 함께 표시합니다. 여기에 잘못된 내용이 있으면 알려 주세요. 무엇이 언제 바뀌었는지 함께 적어 정정 내용을 게시합니다. 답변을 보내셨지만 내용이 게시되기를 원하지 않으시면 말씀해 주세요. 답변 내용 없이 입장만 게시하고, 요청하셨다는 사실을 기록합니다.

문의하기