Skip to main content

Usage analytics is on by default to improve Otranspo. You can turn it off here.

FR

Rideau-Rockcliffe

Peter J. Karwacki

AnsweredNo time counted

The correspondence

Published messages and withheld-reply notices follow the order sent or received. Each document shows its first publication date separately.

  1. Email we sent

    Otranspo · Sent or received · First published

    Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Dear Peter J. Karwacki,

    I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here is the live transit scorecard for Rideau-Rockcliffe: https://otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/13. Right now it shows 66.5% of arrivals landing within five minutes of schedule, graded route by route from OC Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, next to a live map of the vehicles running through the ward and a plain list of what would fix the worst of it. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings attached.

    Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's all in the City's own contract disclosures:

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf

    The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders.

    Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced rider surveys.

    Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at https://otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City nothing.

    Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that it works.

    So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected:

    1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and performance, before it gets extended again.

    2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology going forward.

    3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back with the City.

    I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes to show you or your team the platform.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 7205f53083c1261361a95994a3719ef175756f50d3f56c9ea3054e1304a7aa81

    Link to this message

  2. Reply email

    Written by them · Sent or received · First published

    Re: Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Dear Wyatt, Thanks for writing, and for doing this the right way — sourced, dated, with the actual contract disclosures attached rather than just an accusation. That's rare, and it's exactly the kind of documentation I try to build my own posts around. On the substance: yes to all three, and I'll explain why rather than just checking boxes. On #1, a public Transit Commission review of contract 33523-92002-G01 before any extension: this is squarely the kind of thing that should never have avoided a council vote in the first place. A sole-source exception used once is a judgment call. Three sole-source payments to the same vendor over three years, totalling close to $700,000, with no public term or per-rider pricing attached to any of them, isn't an exception anymore, it's a pattern that delegated authority was never supposed to cover. I don't need to take your word for the STO comparison either — the fact that a neighbouring agency got the same core product for nothing is exactly the kind of baseline that should have been in front of whoever signed off on the Royale rollout. I'll commit to pushing for that review, and to asking publicly what the $180,000 actually bought: one year, multiple years, a flat fee, or something priced per subscriber. On #2, open and competitive processes for rider-facing transit tech going forward: agreed without qualification. This is the same argument I've made about 311 — the City keeps treating its own resident-facing data infrastructure as a one-off purchase instead of a piece of civic infrastructure that should be competitively and transparently sourced, then held to a measurable standard afterward. A subscription nobody can price is an output, not an outcome. On #3, an open partnership framework so platforms like yours can integrate and share data back with the City: I support the principle, and I'd want it built as an actual framework with clear technical and data-governance criteria, not a handshake deal with one vendor replacing another. The problem with 33523-92002-G01 wasn't that a private company was involved, it was that the terms were never public and never competed. Whatever comes next has to be open by design, or we've just moved the same failure mode onto a different platform. I'd take you up on the 15 minutes to see otranspo.ca directly, and I'll have a proper answer up before October 1st. In the meantime: yes, yes, and yes-with-the-framework-built-right. Sincerely, Peter Karwacki On Wed, Sep 9, 2026, 10:00 p.m. Wyatt Baldwin · otranspo.ca < hello@otranspo.ca> wrote: > Dear Peter J. Karwacki, > > I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, > an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here > is the live transit scorecard for Rideau-Rockcliffe: > otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/13. Right now it shows 66.5% of arrivals > landing within five minutes of schedule, graded route by route from OC > Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, next to a live > map of the vehicles running through the ward and a plain list of what would > fix the worst of it. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings > attached. > > Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to > $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one > contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, > $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in > 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all > sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never > went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's > all in the City's own contract disclosures: > > Transit contracts awarded under delegated authority (PDF) > <https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf> > > Contracts under delegation of authority, January 1 to June 30, 2025 (PDF) > <https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf> > > The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a > subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, > and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of > $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of > a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the > term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the > City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from > Ottawa's own riders. > > Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau > launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said > publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's > buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: Le Droit report > <https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e>). > What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's > own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced > rider surveys. > > Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent > scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at > otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and > breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with > real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City > nothing. > > Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is > trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that > it works. > > So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected: > > 1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app > contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and > performance, before it gets extended again. > > 2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology > going forward. > > 3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine > included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back > with the City. > > I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance > voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes > to show you or your team the platform. > > Respectfully, > Wyatt Baldwin > otranspo.ca >

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 8a04bd3c64b91aa6a7a9218195f3cfbcd11e0461e1a48a3a80641e310a889332

    Link to this message

  3. Email we sent

    Otranspo · Sent or received · First published

    A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Dear Peter J. Karwacki,

    Thank you for replying on September 10. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you.

    My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract

    You said yes to the 15 minutes I offered, and I haven't booked it. I'm not going to squeeze it into the last four weeks of your campaign; advance voting is about to start and your time belongs to voters right now. After election day on October 26 the offer stands, elected or not, and I'll write to you then to find a time.

    As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, with my letter beside it. Yours is on file. If you'd rather your position were summarised than quoted, tell me by Wednesday, September 30 and I'll publish it without your words and note that you asked.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 7cf6ff5bd823fbcea56debae9b9bb93852b57f21ba12a319ec3b3c103b72c30e

    Link to this message

  4. Reply email

    Written by them · Sent or received · First published

    Re: A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Voter engagement in Rideau Rockcliffe, home of the PM and governor general is very low. Peter On Mon, Sep 28, 2026, 11:51 p.m. Wyatt Baldwin · otranspo.ca < hello@otranspo.ca> wrote: > Dear Peter J. Karwacki, > > Thank you for replying on September 10. Two things since, and one of them > is a correction I owe you. > > My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract > (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I > left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 > extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus > customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna > Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and > asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The > corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the > contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract > > You said yes to the 15 minutes I offered, and I haven't booked it. I'm not > going to squeeze it into the last four weeks of your campaign; advance > voting is about to start and your time belongs to voters right now. After > election day on October 26 the offer stands, elected or not, and I'll write > to you then to find a time. > > As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at > https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October > 1, the day advance voting starts, with my letter beside it. Yours is on > file. If you'd rather your position were summarised than quoted, tell me by > Wednesday, September 30 and I'll publish it without your words and note > that you asked. > > Respectfully, > Wyatt Baldwin > otranspo.ca >

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 cdac9bbe0b2963cffee2174d1c7acd0430dec5e34978c7f69d72e11686b048c0

    Link to this message

Delivery and reply timeline

Mail delivery state
Sent; delivery unconfirmed
State recorded
September 9, 2026 at 10:00 p.m. EDT
  1. Sent; delivery unconfirmed
  2. Email we sent · Otranspo
  3. Reply email · Written by them
  4. Sent; delivery unconfirmed
  5. Email we sent · Otranspo
  6. Reply email · Written by them

The three things we asked for

The reading below is ours, not a quotation. Their own words are further down, and you can judge for yourself.

1 Contract review
CommittedCommitted, and argued the case: three sole-source payments to one vendor over three years is a pattern rather than an exception.
2 Open procurement
CommittedCommitted without conditions.
3 Open integration
CommittedCommitted without conditions.

Changes to this page

  • September 30, 2026Publication decision recorded 30 September 2026: the reply is published verbatim, released together with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa, the day advance voting starts, as the letter of 9 September said.Publication state changed: Pending editorial review to Published verbatimAffected message
  • September 28, 2026Publication decision recorded 28 September 2026: the reply is published verbatim, released together with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa, the day advance voting starts, as the letter of 9 September said.Publication state changed: Pending editorial review to Published verbatimAffected message

If your entry is here

Every entry stays open. A reply that arrives months from now is published and the page says it arrived after publication, with both dates. If anything here is wrong, write to us and the correction is published with what changed and when. If you replied and would rather your words were not printed, say so and we will publish your position without your text, and record that you asked.

Write to us