Skip to main content

Usage analytics is on by default to improve Otranspo. You can turn it off here.

FR

City-wide

Mark Sutcliffe

Sent, delivery not confirmedNo time counted

We sent it and never received confirmation that it landed. We do not count a response time from a delivery we cannot show.

The correspondence

Published messages and withheld-reply notices follow the order sent or received. Each document shows its first publication date separately.

  1. Email we sent

    Otranspo · Sent or received · First published

    The $700K Transit app deal council never voted on, and an Ottawa-built alternative

    Dear Mayor Sutcliffe,

    I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. I'm writing because you're both the sitting Mayor and a candidate in October's election.

    First, in transparency: because part of what I'm asking for could benefit my platform, I wrote to the City's Integrity Commissioner before sending this and asked whether it counts as lobbying. Her office advised that pre-registration is not required and asked me to report back once I had made contact. I am sending her office a copy of these communications, and I will register in the Lobbyist Registry if her office determines that registration applies. Doing things the right way is the whole reason otranspo.ca exists.

    Here is what I want you to know. Since June 2023, the City has committed close to $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in 2025 for crowdsourced rider surveys through its Rate-My-Ride feature. There was no RFP, it was all sole-sourced under Section 22(1)(d) of the Procurement By-law, and it never came to you for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's all in the City's own contract disclosures:

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf

    The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders.

    Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced rider surveys.

    Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at https://otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City nothing.

    Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system, a fully grade-separated O-Train spine and one of the most extensive bus rapid transit networks on the continent. What we've lost is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that it works.

    So I'm asking you to commit to three things:

    1. Support a public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and performance, before it is extended again.

    2. Commit to fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology going forward.

    3. Support an open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back with the City, at a fraction of what we commit now.

    I'm publishing every candidate's position on otranspo.ca before advance voting starts October 1. I'd welcome 15 minutes to show you or your staff the platform, starting with the live scorecard for all 24 wards: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights?view=scoreboards&board=wards

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 2d4c5839a15f810726b819832a405b98218c39f05377e28612f06cef20659454

    Link to this message

  2. Email we sent

    Otranspo · Sent or received · First published

    A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Dear Mayor Sutcliffe,

    I wrote to you on September 9 about the City's Transit app contract. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you.

    My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract

    In that letter I also offered 15 minutes to show you the platform. I'm holding that until after election day. With advance voting about to start, the last four weeks of a campaign are not the time for me to be asking for yours. After October 26 the offer stands for anyone who wants it, elected or not, and I'll write again then.

    As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, and the page records who answered and who didn't. If you want your position on the record, a reply by Wednesday, September 30 is all it takes; the three asks are unchanged.

    As with my first letter, a copy of this note goes to the Integrity Commissioner's office.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 5f567f353680528b926332b4289841b398e94cadc32a4a68c42fd3954a2ba30e

    Link to this message

No reply is on record, and no time is being counted. See the status above.

Delivery and reply timeline

Mail delivery state
Sent; delivery unconfirmed
State recorded
September 9, 2026 at 9:29 p.m. EDT
  1. Sent; delivery unconfirmed
  2. Email we sent · Otranspo
  3. Sent; delivery unconfirmed
  4. Email we sent · Otranspo

The three things we asked for

The reading below is ours, not a quotation. Their own words are further down, and you can judge for yourself.

1 Contract review
No position on record
2 Open procurement
No position on record
3 Open integration
No position on record

If your entry is here

Every entry stays open. A reply that arrives months from now is published and the page says it arrived after publication, with both dates. If anything here is wrong, write to us and the correction is published with what changed and when. If you replied and would rather your words were not printed, say so and we will publish your position without your text, and record that you asked.

Write to us