Skip to main content

Usage analytics is on by default to improve Otranspo. You can turn it off here.

FR

College

Abakar Malloum

AnsweredNo time counted

The correspondence

Published messages and withheld-reply notices follow the order sent or received. Each document shows its first publication date separately.

  1. Email we sent

    Otranspo · Sent or received · First published

    Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Dear Malloum Abakar,

    I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here is the live transit scorecard for College: https://otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/8. Right now it shows 79.6% of arrivals landing within five minutes of schedule, graded route by route from OC Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, next to a live map of the vehicles running through the ward and a plain list of what would fix the worst of it. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings attached.

    Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's all in the City's own contract disclosures:

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf

    The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders.

    Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced rider surveys.

    Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at https://otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City nothing.

    Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that it works.

    So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected:

    1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and performance, before it gets extended again.

    2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology going forward.

    3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back with the City.

    I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes to show you or your team the platform.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 ec7f9dfc19ebd642fefebc713b980533db9081a6422f0460affffe8518b50a49

    Link to this message

  2. Reply email

    Written by them · Sent or received · First published

    Re: Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Wyatt, Thank you for writing and for laying out the contract numbers with sources attached. That's rare. Here are my answers, and you're welcome to publish them as written. On your first ask, yes. A sole-source contract approaching $700,000, signed under delegated authority and never voted on, should be reviewed in public at Transit Commission before it is extended, with the term, the pricing structure and what the City actually received all on the record. I'd support that. On your second, yes. Rider-facing transit technology should go through open, competitive processes. Sole-sourcing should be the documented exception, with the reason published. On your third, I'll give you a partial yes and I'd rather be straight about why. I support an open integration framework in principle, so that Ottawa builders can work with OC Transpo rather than around it. I won't commit to a framework that names a specific platform, including yours. You've made the case against the City choosing a vendor without an open process, and I think that case is right, which means I can't turn around and pick one myself before I've been elected or read the file. One caveat on all three. I haven't independently verified the contract figures or the STO comparison. I'm answering on the principle, and if the numbers turn out differently once I've checked them, I'll say so publicly. Yes to fifteen minutes. Send me some times. On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 9:51 PM Wyatt Baldwin · otranspo.ca < hello@otranspo.ca> wrote: > Dear Malloum Abakar, > > I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, > an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here > is the live transit scorecard for College: otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/8. > Right now it shows 79.6% of arrivals landing within five minutes of > schedule, graded route by route from OC Transpo's own settled arrivals over > the last fourteen days, next to a live map of the vehicles running through > the ward and a plain list of what would fix the worst of it. Use it at the > doors and in debates, no strings attached. > > Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to > $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one > contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, > $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in > 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all > sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never > went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's > all in the City's own contract disclosures: > > Transit contracts awarded under delegated authority (PDF) > <https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf> > > Contracts under delegation of authority, January 1 to June 30, 2025 (PDF) > <https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf> > > The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a > subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, > and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of > $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of > a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the > term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the > City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from > Ottawa's own riders. > > Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau > launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said > publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's > buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: Le Droit report > <https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e>). > What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's > own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced > rider surveys. > > Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent > scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at > otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and > breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with > real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City > nothing. > > Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is > trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that > it works. > > So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected: > > 1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app > contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and > performance, before it gets extended again. > > 2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology > going forward. > > 3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine > included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back > with the City. > > I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance > voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes > to show you or your team the platform. > > Respectfully, > Wyatt Baldwin > otranspo.ca > -- Abakar Malloum Candidate for City Council, Ward 8 (College) (343) 209-6100 · abakarmalloumcollege@gmail.com abakarmalloumcollege-ward.com

    Note at the writer’s request (28 September 2026): the phrase "approaching $700,000" repeats the figure in our letter of 9 September, which we have since corrected to $1,157,794. He asked that this be recorded here, and added that the corrected figure only strengthens the case for a public review.

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 90644ee0db588b308f0cd4df58b83f93c46e53fbfb1cc812c3c45a47069a0af1

    Link to this message

  3. Email we sent

    Otranspo · Sent or received · First published

    A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Dear Malloum Abakar,

    Thank you for replying on September 13. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you.

    My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract

    You asked me to send some times for the fifteen minutes, and I haven't. I'm not going to squeeze it into the last four weeks of your campaign; advance voting is about to start and your time belongs to voters right now. After election day on October 26 the offer stands, elected or not, and I'll write to you then to find a time.

    As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, with my letter beside it. Yours is on file. If you'd rather your position were summarised than quoted, tell me by Wednesday, September 30 and I'll publish it without your words and note that you asked.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 f71fc4328bc0c2292d7068571454d15e86a2fdacefe6f4832569b8ce9332d04d

    Link to this message

Delivery and reply timeline

Mail delivery state
Sent; delivery unconfirmed
State recorded
September 9, 2026 at 9:51 p.m. EDT
  1. Sent; delivery unconfirmed
  2. Email we sent · Otranspo
  3. Reply email · Written by them
  4. Sent; delivery unconfirmed
  5. Email we sent · Otranspo

The three things we asked for

The reading below is ours, not a quotation. Their own words are further down, and you can judge for yourself.

1 Contract review
CommittedYes: the contract should be reviewed in public at Transit Commission before it is extended, with the term, the pricing structure and what the City received on the record.
2 Open procurement
CommittedYes: open, competitive processes, with sole-sourcing as the documented exception and the reason published.
3 Open integration
Partly committedA partial yes by his own description: supports an open integration framework in principle and will not commit to one that names a specific platform. He added that he had not independently verified the figures and would say so publicly if they differed.

Changes to this page

  • September 28, 2026Name corrected at his request on 28 September 2026: listed as Abakar Malloum, given name first. The permanent link to this entry is unchanged.At their request.
  • September 28, 2026Note added at his request on 28 September 2026 beside the phrase "approaching $700,000" in his reply: that figure came from our letter of 9 September and has since been corrected to $1,157,794. He confirmed his answer is to be quoted as written.Publication state changed: Published verbatim to Published verbatimAffected messageAt their request.
  • September 28, 2026Publication decision recorded 28 September 2026: the reply is published verbatim, released together with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa, the day advance voting starts, as the letter of 9 September said.Publication state changed: Pending editorial review to Published verbatimAffected message

If your entry is here

Every entry stays open. A reply that arrives months from now is published and the page says it arrived after publication, with both dates. If anything here is wrong, write to us and the correction is published with what changed and when. If you replied and would rather your words were not printed, say so and we will publish your position without your text, and record that you asked.

Write to us