Skip to main content

Usage analytics is on by default to improve Otranspo. You can turn it off here.

FR

City-wide

Ali Shayvard

AnsweredNo time counted

The correspondence

Published messages and withheld-reply notices follow the order sent or received. Each document shows its first publication date separately.

  1. Email we sent

    Otranspo · Sent or received · First published

    Ottawa's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Dear Ali Shayvard,

    I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here is the live transit scorecard for all 24 Ottawa wards: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights?view=scoreboards&board=wards. It ranks every ward on how often buses actually arrive within five minutes of schedule, measured from OC Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, and each ward opens onto a live map of the vehicles running right now. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings attached.

    Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's all in the City's own contract disclosures:

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf

    The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders.

    Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced rider surveys.

    Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at https://otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City nothing.

    Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that it works.

    So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected:

    1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and performance, before it gets extended again.

    2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology going forward.

    3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back with the City.

    I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes to show you or your team the platform.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 3f4113802aed3c312c283945b9e459cab8d07a402e5d17829efe979d3d21dafa

    Link to this message

  2. Email we sent

    Otranspo · Sent or received · First published

    A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Dear Ali Shayvard,

    I wrote to you on September 9 about the City's Transit app contract. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you.

    My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract

    In that letter I also offered 15 minutes to show you the platform. I'm holding that until after election day. With advance voting about to start, the last four weeks of a campaign are not the time for me to be asking for yours. After October 26 the offer stands for anyone who wants it, elected or not, and I'll write again then.

    As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, and the page records who answered and who didn't. If you want your position on the record, a reply by Wednesday, September 30 is all it takes; the three asks are unchanged.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 380915023dd407d27865b3ee7064c2c8f56845629dcab161bd5ff1ce29e189e2

    Link to this message

  3. Reply email

    Written by them · Sent or received · First published

    Re: A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Hi Wyatt, Thank you so much for contacting me again, and thank you for taking the time to correct the information and provide the updated documentation. I really appreciate the transparency, especially when dealing with public money and public transit. I also appreciate you holding off on the 15-minute presentation until after the election. As you can imagine, these last few weeks of the campaign are extremely busy. If elected, I would absolutely be interested in learning more about the platform and taking a closer look at the information you have gathered. I also want to make sure my position is on the record regarding the three questions you raised. Yes, I support a public review of the Transit app contract before any further extension, including its total cost, terms, pricing structure and whether it is actually providing good value and results for Ottawa residents. Yes, I support fair and open competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology wherever appropriate. Public money needs transparency, accountability and value. Yes, in principle, I support creating a framework that allows qualified Ottawa-built platforms and other innovative services to work with OC Transpo. Any such framework would need proper standards around privacy, cybersecurity, accessibility, data quality and procurement, but I absolutely believe we should be looking at good ideas being developed here in Ottawa. My overall approach to OC Transpo is straightforward: it needs to become reliable again. Riders need buses and trains they can actually depend on, and we need much stronger accountability for how transit dollars are being spent. If I am elected, transit will be one of my highest priorities and I would be glad to continue this conversation with you after October 26. If I am not elected, I expect to return to my previous employment. Any future political or civic involvement I undertake would remain on my own time and completely separate from my workplace responsibilities. I also intend to keep Ali for Ottawa active as a civic movement, continue listening to residents and stay involved in the issues facing our city. I may very well put my name forward again in the future. Either way, I appreciate residents like you taking the time to investigate these issues, ask questions and hold the City accountable. Thank you again, Wyatt, and I look forward to staying in touch. Best regards, Ali Shayvard Candidate for Mayor of Ottawa From the People. For the People. www.AliForOttawa.ca > On Sep 28, 2026, at 5:22 PM, Wyatt Baldwin · otranspo.ca <hello@otranspo.ca> wrote: > >  > Dear Ali Shayvard, > > I wrote to you on September 9 about the City's Transit app contract. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you. > > My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract > > In that letter I also offered 15 minutes to show you the platform. I'm holding that until after election day. With advance voting about to start, the last four weeks of a campaign are not the time for me to be asking for yours. After October 26 the offer stands for anyone who wants it, elected or not, and I'll write again then. > > As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, and the page records who answered and who didn't. If you want your position on the record, a reply by Wednesday, September 30 is all it takes; the three asks are unchanged. > > Respectfully, > Wyatt Baldwin > otranspo.ca

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 bcf3c2fc4ccd3a0ee25f699fb4e028cccf7b7909ea395d4047a5bdfe5e4ae4ad

    Link to this message

Delivery and reply timeline

Mail delivery state
Sent; delivery unconfirmed
State recorded
September 9, 2026 at 9:32 p.m. EDT
  1. Sent; delivery unconfirmed
  2. Email we sent · Otranspo
  3. Sent; delivery unconfirmed
  4. Email we sent · Otranspo
  5. Reply email · Written by them

The three things we asked for

The reading below is ours, not a quotation. Their own words are further down, and you can judge for yourself.

1 Contract review
CommittedYes: a public review of the contract before any further extension, covering total cost, terms, pricing structure and value delivered.
2 Open procurement
CommittedYes: fair and open competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology wherever appropriate.
3 Open integration
CommittedYes in principle: a framework for qualified Ottawa-built platforms to work with OC Transpo, with standards for privacy, cybersecurity, accessibility, data quality and procurement. That is the ask as written.

Changes to this page

  • September 28, 2026Publication decision recorded 28 September 2026: the reply is published verbatim, released together with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa, the day advance voting starts, as the letter of 9 September said.Publication state changed: Pending editorial review to Published verbatimAffected message

If your entry is here

Every entry stays open. A reply that arrives months from now is published and the page says it arrived after publication, with both dates. If anything here is wrong, write to us and the correction is published with what changed and when. If you replied and would rather your words were not printed, say so and we will publish your position without your text, and record that you asked.

Write to us