Skip to main content

Usage analytics is on by default to improve Otranspo. You can turn it off here.

FR

City-wide

Alex Lawson

AnsweredNo time counted

The correspondence

Published messages and withheld-reply notices follow the order sent or received. Each document shows its first publication date separately.

  1. Email we sent

    Otranspo · Sent or received · First published

    Ottawa's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Dear Alex Lawson,

    I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here is the live transit scorecard for all 24 Ottawa wards: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights?view=scoreboards&board=wards. It ranks every ward on how often buses actually arrive within five minutes of schedule, measured from OC Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, and each ward opens onto a live map of the vehicles running right now. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings attached.

    Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's all in the City's own contract disclosures:

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf

    The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders.

    Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced rider surveys.

    Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at https://otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City nothing.

    Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that it works.

    So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected:

    1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and performance, before it gets extended again.

    2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology going forward.

    3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back with the City.

    I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes to show you or your team the platform.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 f7c6a2d46fe8e9f857b604affb0d4bd700f7faa8863d0a64558660cd6e7846b3

    Link to this message

  2. Email we sent

    Otranspo · Sent or received · First published

    A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Dear Alex Lawson,

    I wrote to you on September 9 about the City's Transit app contract. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you.

    My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract

    In that letter I also offered 15 minutes to show you the platform. I'm holding that until after election day. With advance voting about to start, the last four weeks of a campaign are not the time for me to be asking for yours. After October 26 the offer stands for anyone who wants it, elected or not, and I'll write again then.

    As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, and the page records who answered and who didn't. If you want your position on the record, a reply by Wednesday, September 30 is all it takes; the three asks are unchanged.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 9d2c1f796990d94f656dc80cda4032c0abe460e0a17b6844401dd650517d4399

    Link to this message

  3. Reply email

    Written by them · Sent or received · First published

    Re: Ottawa's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Hi Wyatt, As you can imagine, the inbox is a pretty busy place. Unfortunately this means that things slip through the cracks sometimes so thank you for following up. Below are the answers to your questions. 1. In the last several years, no matter how much money has been put into OC Transpo, service and customer experience has not improved. It's a leaky bucket that will never be filled. We will be reviewing many different aspects of the service to plug the leaks, any application contracts will be a part of this process. 2. A fair, open and competitive process will be brought to all aspects of municipal spending. Check out the "Your Money in plain sight" plan on votealex.ca. 3. An answer to this would be the same as above. A fair, open and competitive process. Thanks again for following up. Alex Alex Lawson Candidate for Mayor of Ottawa contact@votealex.ca (613) 981-8881 <6139818881> votealex.ca <https://www.alexanderlawson.ca/> On Wed, 9 Sept 2026 at 21:28, Wyatt Baldwin · otranspo.ca <hello@otranspo.ca> wrote: > Dear Alex Lawson, > > I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, > an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here > is the live transit scorecard for all 24 Ottawa wards: > otranspo.ca/en/insights?view=scoreboards&board=wards. It ranks every ward > on how often buses actually arrive within five minutes of schedule, > measured from OC Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen > days, and each ward opens onto a live map of the vehicles running right > now. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings attached. > > Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to > $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one > contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, > $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in > 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all > sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never > went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's > all in the City's own contract disclosures: > > Transit contracts awarded under delegated authority (PDF) > <https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf> > > Contracts under delegation of authority, January 1 to June 30, 2025 (PDF) > <https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf> > > The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a > subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, > and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of > $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of > a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the > term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the > City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from > Ottawa's own riders. > > Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau > launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said > publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's > buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: Le Droit report > <https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e>). > What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's > own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced > rider surveys. > > Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent > scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at > otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and > breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with > real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City > nothing. > > Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is > trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that > it works. > > So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected: > > 1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app > contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and > performance, before it gets extended again. > > 2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology > going forward. > > 3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine > included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back > with the City. > > I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance > voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes > to show you or your team the platform. > > Respectfully, > Wyatt Baldwin > otranspo.ca >

    Check this record

    Publication state: Published verbatim

    Stored source matches the ingestion hash.

    SHA-256 ebacf3a9a838ba1abaf54a3fd3eaa5f27265e002deea91c3f298e1b215ef6692

    Link to this message

Delivery and reply timeline

Mail delivery state
Sent; delivery unconfirmed
State recorded
September 9, 2026 at 9:28 p.m. EDT
  1. Sent; delivery unconfirmed
  2. Email we sent · Otranspo
  3. Sent; delivery unconfirmed
  4. Email we sent · Otranspo
  5. Reply email · Written by them

The three things we asked for

The reading below is ours, not a quotation. Their own words are further down, and you can judge for yourself.

1 Contract review
Partly committedWill review many aspects of OC Transpo spending and said application contracts will be part of that; did not commit to a public review at Transit Commission before any extension.
2 Open procurement
CommittedYes: a fair, open and competitive process for all municipal spending, as set out in his platform.
3 Open integration
Partly committedAnswered with the same fair, open and competitive process; did not address a framework for outside platforms to integrate with OC Transpo or share data back.

Changes to this page

  • September 30, 2026Publication decision recorded 30 September 2026: the reply is published verbatim, released together with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa, the day advance voting starts, as the letter of 9 September said.Publication state changed: Pending editorial review to Published verbatimAffected message

If your entry is here

Every entry stays open. A reply that arrives months from now is published and the page says it arrived after publication, with both dates. If anything here is wrong, write to us and the correction is published with what changed and when. If you replied and would rather your words were not printed, say so and we will publish your position without your text, and record that you asked.

Write to us