본문으로 건너뛰기

운행

문제 신고

이 페이지는 특정 정류장, 노선, 역, 차량에 대한 것이 아니에요. 하나를 열면 신고에 그 이름이 들어가요. 또는 전체 신고를 이용하세요.

무슨 일이 있었나요
전체 신고 내용 계정이 필요 없어요

Orléans East-Cumberland

Mazhar Choudhry

답변 완료집계된 시간 없음

주고받은 서신

공개된 메시지와 보류된 답변 알림은 보내거나 받은 순서대로 나열합니다. 각 문서에는 최초 공개 날짜가 따로 표시됩니다.

  1. 우리가 보낸 이메일

    Otranspo · 보냄 또는 받음 · 최초 게시일

    Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Dear Mazhar Choudhry,

    I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here is the live transit scorecard for Orléans East-Cumberland: https://otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/1. Right now it shows 82.0% of arrivals landing within five minutes of schedule, graded route by route from OC Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, next to a live map of the vehicles running through the ward and a plain list of what would fix the worst of it. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings attached.

    Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's all in the City's own contract disclosures:

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf

    The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders.

    Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced rider surveys.

    Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at https://otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City nothing.

    Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that it works.

    So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected:

    1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and performance, before it gets extended again.

    2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology going forward.

    3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back with the City.

    I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes to show you or your team the platform.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    이 기록 확인하기

    게시 상태: 원문 그대로 게시됨

    저장된 원본이 수집 해시와 일치합니다.

    SHA-256 체크섬 d4648c25f2f044d25d1a1a23774e3f4f1dab00d248a874a94840c8645701a5e2

    이 메시지 링크

  2. 우리가 보낸 이메일

    Otranspo · 보냄 또는 받음 · 최초 게시일

    A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Dear Mazhar Choudhry,

    I wrote to you on September 9 about the City's Transit app contract. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you.

    My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract

    In that letter I also offered 15 minutes to show you the platform. I'm holding that until after election day. With advance voting about to start, the last four weeks of a campaign are not the time for me to be asking for yours. After October 26 the offer stands for anyone who wants it, elected or not, and I'll write again then.

    As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, and the page records who answered and who didn't. If you want your position on the record, a reply by Wednesday, September 30 is all it takes; the three asks are unchanged.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    이 기록 확인하기

    게시 상태: 원문 그대로 게시됨

    저장된 원본이 수집 해시와 일치합니다.

    SHA-256 체크섬 68151b48e242a104070aaed4e1f89353c6e535c74ab97c6ee17d7166568b0fcd

    이 메시지 링크

  3. 회신 이메일

    상대방이 작성 · 보냄 또는 받음 · 최초 게시일

    Re: A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Hi Wyatt, How are you? Thanks for the information. 1. PUBLIC REVIEW OF TRANSIT APP ARRANGEMENT Yes. Riders deserve to know exactly what the city is paying for transit technology, how it was procured, and whether it has delivered results. No extension should be approved without a full public review at Transit Commission. Transparency is not optional when public money is involved. ─── 2. FAIR, OPEN, COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT FOR TRANSIT TECHNOLOGY Yes. Open and competitive processes protect taxpayers, drive better value, and prevent the kind of opaque arrangements that erode public trust. Rider-facing technology should be selected on merit, not relationships. I will support this as a standing principle at Transit Commission. ─── 3. OPEN PARTNERSHIP FRAMEWORK FOR OTTAWA-BUILT PLATFORMS Yes. Ottawa has a strong technology sector and there is no reason local platforms should be locked out of the transit ecosystem. I support an open integration framework that allows qualified Ottawa-built solutions to connect with OC Transpo data and contribute crowdsourced intelligence back to the city. Better data leads to better service for riders. Best, Mazhar Choudhry Candidate for City Council in Orléans East-Cumberland Ward 1 250 Centrum Blvd, Unit 206 https://choudhry.org On Sep 28, 2026 at 5:27 PM -0400, Wyatt Baldwin · otranspo.ca <hello@otranspo.ca>, wrote: > Dear Mazhar Choudhry, > I wrote to you on September 9 about the City's Transit app contract. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you. > My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract > In that letter I also offered 15 minutes to show you the platform. I'm holding that until after election day. With advance voting about to start, the last four weeks of a campaign are not the time for me to be asking for yours. After October 26 the offer stands for anyone who wants it, elected or not, and I'll write again then. > As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, and the page records who answered and who didn't. If you want your position on the record, a reply by Wednesday, September 30 is all it takes; the three asks are unchanged. > Respectfully, > Wyatt Baldwin > otranspo.ca

    이 기록 확인하기

    게시 상태: 원문 그대로 게시됨

    저장된 원본이 수집 해시와 일치합니다.

    SHA-256 체크섬 aa328dc1f97e7de17ea83c484a24fe4c91bb71902c3bdf8b8105c3e753c16e1c

    이 메시지 링크

전달 및 답변 일정

우편 발송 상태
발송됨, 수신 확인 안 됨
기록된 상태
2026년 9월 9일 오후 9:37 GMT-4
  1. 발송됨, 수신 확인 안 됨
  2. 우리가 보낸 이메일 · Otranspo
  3. 발송됨, 수신 확인 안 됨
  4. 우리가 보낸 이메일 · Otranspo
  5. 회신 이메일 · 상대방이 작성

우리가 요청한 세 가지

아래 해석은 저희의 해석이며 인용이 아닙니다. 후보자의 직접 발언은 더 아래에 있으니 직접 판단해 보세요.

1 계약 검토
약속함Yes: no extension should be approved without a full public review at Transit Commission of what the City pays, how it was procured and whether it delivered.
2 공개 조달
약속함Yes: open and competitive processes as a standing principle at Transit Commission, technology selected on merit.
3 연동 열기
약속함Yes: an open integration framework so qualified Ottawa-built solutions can connect with OC Transpo data and contribute crowdsourced intelligence back.

이 페이지의 변경 내용

  • 2026년 9월 28일Publication decision recorded 28 September 2026: the reply is published verbatim, released together with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa, the day advance voting starts, as the letter of 9 September said.공개 상태가 변경되었습니다: 편집 검토 대기 중 to 원문 그대로 게시됨영향받은 메시지

본인의 항목이 여기에 있다면

모든 항목은 계속 열려 있습니다. 몇 달 뒤에 도착한 답변도 게시되며, 페이지에 게시 후에 도착했다고 두 날짜와 함께 표시합니다. 여기에 잘못된 내용이 있으면 알려 주세요. 무엇이 언제 바뀌었는지 함께 적어 정정 내용을 게시합니다. 답변을 보내셨지만 내용이 게시되기를 원하지 않으시면 말씀해 주세요. 답변 내용 없이 입장만 게시하고, 요청하셨다는 사실을 기록합니다.

문의하기