跳至主要內容

服務

回報問題

此頁面不是關於單一站牌、路線、車站或車輛。請開啟其中一項,讓回報註明它,或使用完整回報。

發生了什麼事
完整報告 不需要帳戶

Rideau-Vanier

Michael Karl Sewanaku

已回覆未計算時間

往來信函

已發布的訊息和未公開回覆的通知,依發送或收到的先後次序排列。每份文件另外標示其首次發布日期。

  1. 我們寄出的電子郵件

    Otranspo · 發送或接收 · 首次發布

    Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Dear Michael Karl Sewanaku,

    I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here is the live transit scorecard for Rideau-Vanier: https://otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/12. Right now it shows 66.3% of arrivals landing within five minutes of schedule, graded route by route from OC Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, next to a live map of the vehicles running through the ward and a plain list of what would fix the worst of it. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings attached.

    Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's all in the City's own contract disclosures:

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf

    The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders.

    Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced rider surveys.

    Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at https://otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City nothing.

    Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that it works.

    So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected:

    1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and performance, before it gets extended again.

    2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology going forward.

    3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back with the City.

    I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes to show you or your team the platform.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    查核這筆記錄

    發布狀態: 原文照登

    儲存的來源與擷取時的雜湊值相符。

    SHA-256 校驗碼 3267731378447dfc0a2aaf0240e543004fe0f503472aa5d573dfc4c81baf3d9a

    此訊息的連結

  2. 回覆電郵

    由對方撰寫 · 發送或接收 · 首次發布

    Re: Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Hello Wyatt, Thank you for reaching out and for building your tool. I support your three proposals including publicly reviewing the existing contract. I believe a MFIPPA request can disclose the contract to the public, but not sure at the moment. I would rather see public money support a capable Ottawa technology company than be automatically directed to a Montreal company without an open process. Too often, companies can take advantage of decision makers who lack technical experience and likely get their way into contracts through lobbying. I have a small understanding of the possibilities because I previously built an Android English-learning app that was available through the Google Play Store years ago, so I admit I am somewhat biased in favour of local innovation by smaller tech companies. Best Regards, Michael Karl Sewanaku Candidate for Councillor, Ward 12 Rideau–Vanier On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 9:59 PM Wyatt Baldwin · otranspo.ca < hello@otranspo.ca> wrote: > Dear Michael Karl Sewanaku, > > I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, > an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here > is the live transit scorecard for Rideau-Vanier: > otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/12. Right now it shows 66.3% of arrivals > landing within five minutes of schedule, graded route by route from OC > Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, next to a live > map of the vehicles running through the ward and a plain list of what would > fix the worst of it. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings > attached. > > Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to > $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one > contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, > $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in > 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all > sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never > went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's > all in the City's own contract disclosures: > > Transit contracts awarded under delegated authority (PDF) > <https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf> > > Contracts under delegation of authority, January 1 to June 30, 2025 (PDF) > <https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf> > > The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a > subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, > and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of > $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of > a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the > term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the > City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from > Ottawa's own riders. > > Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau > launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said > publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's > buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: Le Droit report > <https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e>). > What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's > own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced > rider surveys. > > Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent > scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at > otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and > breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with > real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City > nothing. > > Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is > trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that > it works. > > So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected: > > 1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app > contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and > performance, before it gets extended again. > > 2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology > going forward. > > 3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine > included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back > with the City. > > I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance > voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes > to show you or your team the platform. > > Respectfully, > Wyatt Baldwin > otranspo.ca >

    查核這筆記錄

    發布狀態: 原文照登

    儲存的來源與擷取時的雜湊值相符。

    SHA-256 校驗碼 23aff0f4da60d199cf73848aab656d45ca2969eb96635a86c51fd9d5414a8cbf

    此訊息的連結

  3. 我們寄出的電子郵件

    Otranspo · 發送或接收 · 首次發布

    A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Dear Michael Karl Sewanaku,

    Thank you for replying on September 14. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you.

    My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract

    In that letter I also offered 15 minutes to show you the platform. I'm holding that until after election day. With advance voting about to start, the last four weeks of a campaign are not the time for me to be asking for yours. After October 26 the offer stands for anyone who wants it, elected or not, and I'll write again then.

    As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, with my letter beside it. Yours is on file. If you'd rather your position were summarised than quoted, tell me by Wednesday, September 30 and I'll publish it without your words and note that you asked.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    查核這筆記錄

    發布狀態: 原文照登

    儲存的來源與擷取時的雜湊值相符。

    SHA-256 校驗碼 2a01849e10a6927f9d8939414731eeb8cc13deccd236ad66f5bd2c482b61a2f1

    此訊息的連結

送達和回覆時間表

郵件寄送狀態
已寄出;未確認送達
記錄的狀態
2026年9月9日 下午9:59 [EDT]
  1. 已寄出;未確認送達
  2. 我們寄出的電子郵件 · Otranspo
  3. 回覆電郵 · 由對方撰寫
  4. 已寄出;未確認送達
  5. 我們寄出的電子郵件 · Otranspo

我們提出的三項要求

以下解讀是我們自己的看法,並非引述。他們自己的原話在更下方,您可以自行判斷。

1 合約審查
已承諾Supported all three proposals, and singled out the public review of the existing contract.
2 公開採購
已承諾Supported all three proposals; said public money should not be directed to a vendor without an open process.
3 開啟整合
已承諾Supported all three proposals, noting his own preference for local innovation.

此頁面的更動

  • 2026年9月28日Publication decision recorded 28 September 2026: the reply is published verbatim, released together with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa, the day advance voting starts, as the letter of 9 September said.發布狀態已變更: 待編輯審核 to 原文照登受影響的訊息

如果此處有您的資料

每一筆紀錄都會保持公開。數月後才收到的回覆也會發布,頁面會註明回覆是在發布後才收到,並列出兩個日期。如果這裡有任何錯誤,請來信告知,我們會發布更正內容,並註明更改了什麼以及何時更改。如果您已回覆,但不希望刊登您的文字,請告訴我們,我們會只發布您的立場而不附上您的文字,並記錄您提出了這項要求。

寫信給我們