跳至主要內容

服務

回報問題

此頁面不是關於單一站牌、路線、車站或車輛。請開啟其中一項,讓回報註明它,或使用完整回報。

發生了什麼事
完整報告 不需要帳戶

全市

Jeff Leiper

已寄出,未確認送達未計算時間

我們已送出,但從未收到送達確認。我們無法證明已送達,所以不計算回應時間。

往來信函

已發布的訊息和未公開回覆的通知,依發送或收到的先後次序排列。每份文件另外標示其首次發布日期。

  1. 我們寄出的電子郵件

    Otranspo · 發送或接收 · 首次發布

    The $700K Transit app deal council never voted on, and an Ottawa-built alternative

    Dear Councillor Leiper,

    I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. I'm writing because you're both the sitting councillor for Kitchissippi and a candidate for Mayor in October's election.

    First, in transparency: because part of what I'm asking for could benefit my platform, I wrote to the City's Integrity Commissioner before sending this and asked whether it counts as lobbying. Her office advised that pre-registration is not required and asked me to report back once I had made contact. I am sending her office a copy of these communications, and I will register in the Lobbyist Registry if her office determines that registration applies. Doing things the right way is the whole reason otranspo.ca exists.

    Here is what I want you to know. Since June 2023, the City has committed close to $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in 2025 for crowdsourced rider surveys through its Rate-My-Ride feature. There was no RFP, it was all sole-sourced under Section 22(1)(d) of the Procurement By-law, and it never came to you for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's all in the City's own contract disclosures:

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf

    The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders.

    Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced rider surveys.

    Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at https://otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City nothing.

    Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system, a fully grade-separated O-Train spine and one of the most extensive bus rapid transit networks on the continent. What we've lost is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that it works.

    So I'm asking you to commit to three things:

    1. Support a public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and performance, before it is extended again.

    2. Commit to fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology going forward.

    3. Support an open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back with the City, at a fraction of what we commit now.

    I'm publishing every candidate's position on otranspo.ca before advance voting starts October 1. I'd welcome 15 minutes to show you or your staff the platform, starting with the live scorecard for all 24 wards: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights?view=scoreboards&board=wards

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    查核這筆記錄

    發布狀態: 原文照登

    儲存的來源與擷取時的雜湊值相符。

    SHA-256 校驗碼 fb691946e82474ad18cbe6b199d1d9012cd8f7456982a96aef36bff3dca47b77

    此訊息的連結

  2. 我們寄出的電子郵件

    Otranspo · 發送或接收 · 首次發布

    A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Dear Councillor Leiper,

    I wrote to you on September 9 about the City's Transit app contract. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you.

    My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract

    In that letter I also offered 15 minutes to show you the platform. I'm holding that until after election day. With advance voting about to start, the last four weeks of a campaign are not the time for me to be asking for yours. After October 26 the offer stands for anyone who wants it, elected or not, and I'll write again then.

    As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, and the page records who answered and who didn't. If you want your position on the record, a reply by Wednesday, September 30 is all it takes; the three asks are unchanged.

    As with my first letter, a copy of this note goes to the Integrity Commissioner's office.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    查核這筆記錄

    發布狀態: 原文照登

    儲存的來源與擷取時的雜湊值相符。

    SHA-256 校驗碼 68269773f317482c0f1c2bd2eda0ca022c8d7d0bbefd2e9564a34110147ec2ef

    此訊息的連結

目前沒有任何回覆紀錄,也沒有在計時。請見上方的狀態。

送達和回覆時間表

郵件寄送狀態
已寄出;未確認送達
記錄的狀態
2026年9月9日 下午9:28 [EDT]
  1. 已寄出;未確認送達
  2. 我們寄出的電子郵件 · Otranspo
  3. 已寄出;未確認送達
  4. 我們寄出的電子郵件 · Otranspo

我們提出的三項要求

以下解讀是我們自己的看法,並非引述。他們自己的原話在更下方,您可以自行判斷。

1 合約審查
沒有立場記錄
2 公開採購
沒有立場記錄
3 開啟整合
沒有立場記錄

如果此處有您的資料

每一筆紀錄都會保持公開。數月後才收到的回覆也會發布,頁面會註明回覆是在發布後才收到,並列出兩個日期。如果這裡有任何錯誤,請來信告知,我們會發布更正內容,並註明更改了什麼以及何時更改。如果您已回覆,但不希望刊登您的文字,請告訴我們,我們會只發布您的立場而不附上您的文字,並記錄您提出了這項要求。

寫信給我們