跳至主要內容

服務

回報問題

此頁面不是關於單一站牌、路線、車站或車輛。請開啟其中一項,讓回報註明它,或使用完整回報。

發生了什麼事
完整報告 不需要帳戶

Alta Vista

Elsa Niyongabo

已回覆,但未表態未計算時間

有人已回覆。回覆沒有承諾三項要求中的任何一項,所以答覆計時仍在進行。

回覆來自其辦公室,而不是本人。

往來信函

已發布的訊息和未公開回覆的通知,依發送或收到的先後次序排列。每份文件另外標示其首次發布日期。

  1. 我們寄出的電子郵件

    Otranspo · 發送或接收 · 首次發布

    Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Dear Elsa Niyongabo,

    I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here is the live transit scorecard for Alta Vista: https://otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/18. Right now it shows 78.8% of arrivals landing within five minutes of schedule, graded route by route from OC Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, next to a live map of the vehicles running through the ward and a plain list of what would fix the worst of it. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings attached.

    Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's all in the City's own contract disclosures:

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf

    The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders.

    Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced rider surveys.

    Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at https://otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City nothing.

    Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that it works.

    So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected:

    1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and performance, before it gets extended again.

    2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology going forward.

    3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back with the City.

    I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes to show you or your team the platform.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    查核這筆記錄

    發布狀態: 原文照登

    儲存的來源與擷取時的雜湊值相符。

    SHA-256 校驗碼 5ac6e6b967b023a92425d8df8f6f239de2931a7905bf86d0ca6846eef1462efe

    此訊息的連結

  2. 已發布的摘要

    由其辦公室撰寫 · 發送或接收 · 首次發布

    Her campaign team acknowledged the letter on September 24, thanked the site for its work, and took no position on any of the three asks.

    這是我們整理的摘要。此處不會刊出撰寫者的原文。

    查核這筆記錄

    發布狀態: 已以編輯摘要形式發布

    儲存的來源與擷取時的雜湊值相符。

    SHA-256 校驗碼 9ec63f841522276b01f1751caad83c3d0eebac6a01274c14eb6510ae241fed64

    此訊息的連結

  3. 我們寄出的電子郵件

    Otranspo · 發送或接收 · 首次發布

    A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Dear Elsa Niyongabo,

    Thank you to your team for the note on September 24. Two things since my letter of September 9, and one of them is a correction I owe you.

    My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract

    In that letter I also offered 15 minutes to show you the platform. I'm holding that until after election day. With advance voting about to start, the last four weeks of a campaign are not the time for me to be asking for yours. After October 26 the offer stands for anyone who wants it, elected or not, and I'll write again then.

    As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, and the page records who answered and who didn't. If you want your position on the record, a reply by Wednesday, September 30 is all it takes; the three asks are unchanged.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    查核這筆記錄

    發布狀態: 原文照登

    儲存的來源與擷取時的雜湊值相符。

    SHA-256 校驗碼 a92d4df796b4f0527bb6a6e123ee26eea26a470e74d987b9ad8fc98bddff4267

    此訊息的連結

送達和回覆時間表

郵件寄送狀態
已寄出;未確認送達
記錄的狀態
2026年9月9日 下午10:11 [EDT]
  1. 已寄出;未確認送達
  2. 我們寄出的電子郵件 · Otranspo
  3. 已發布的摘要 · 由其辦公室撰寫
  4. 已寄出;未確認送達
  5. 我們寄出的電子郵件 · Otranspo

我們提出的三項要求

以下解讀是我們自己的看法,並非引述。他們自己的原話在更下方,您可以自行判斷。

1 合約審查
沒有立場記錄
2 公開採購
沒有立場記錄
3 開啟整合
沒有立場記錄

此頁面的更動

  • 2026年9月28日Publication decision recorded 28 September 2026: an editorial summary only, because the reply was written by campaign staff rather than the candidate and takes no position. Released with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa.發布狀態已變更: 待編輯審核 to 已以編輯摘要形式發布受影響的訊息

如果此處有您的資料

每一筆紀錄都會保持公開。數月後才收到的回覆也會發布,頁面會註明回覆是在發布後才收到,並列出兩個日期。如果這裡有任何錯誤,請來信告知,我們會發布更正內容,並註明更改了什麼以及何時更改。如果您已回覆,但不希望刊登您的文字,請告訴我們,我們會只發布您的立場而不附上您的文字,並記錄您提出了這項要求。

寫信給我們