رفتن به محتوای اصلی

خدمات

گزارش مشکل

این صفحه درباره یک ایستگاه بس، مسیر، ایستگاه قطار یا وسیله نقلیه نیست. لطفاً یکی را باز کنید تا گزارش آن را نام ببرد، یا از گزارش کامل استفاده کنید.

چه اتفاقی افتاد
گزارش کامل نیازی به حساب کاربری نیست

College

Abakar Malloum

پاسخ داده شدزمانی شمرده نشد

مکاتبات و نامه‌ها

پیام‌های نشرشده و اطلاعیه‌های پاسخ نگه‌داشته‌شده به ترتیب ارسال یا دریافت می‌آیند. هر سند تاریخ نخستین نشر خود را جداگانه نشان می‌دهد.

  1. ایمیلی که فرستادیم

    Otranspo · فرستاده یا دریافت‌شده · نخستین انتشار

    Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Dear Malloum Abakar,

    I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here is the live transit scorecard for College: https://otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/8. Right now it shows 79.6% of arrivals landing within five minutes of schedule, graded route by route from OC Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, next to a live map of the vehicles running through the ward and a plain list of what would fix the worst of it. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings attached.

    Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's all in the City's own contract disclosures:

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf

    The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders.

    Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced rider surveys.

    Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at https://otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City nothing.

    Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that it works.

    So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected:

    1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and performance, before it gets extended again.

    2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology going forward.

    3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back with the City.

    I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes to show you or your team the platform.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    لطفاً این سابقه را بررسی کنید

    وضعیت انتشار: بدون تغییر منتشر شده

    منبع ذخیره‌شده با هش دریافت مطابقت دارد.

    شا-256 ec7f9dfc19ebd642fefebc713b980533db9081a6422f0460affffe8518b50a49

    پیوند به این پیام

  2. ایمیل پاسخ

    نوشته شده توسط آنان · فرستاده یا دریافت‌شده · نخستین انتشار

    Re: Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Wyatt, Thank you for writing and for laying out the contract numbers with sources attached. That's rare. Here are my answers, and you're welcome to publish them as written. On your first ask, yes. A sole-source contract approaching $700,000, signed under delegated authority and never voted on, should be reviewed in public at Transit Commission before it is extended, with the term, the pricing structure and what the City actually received all on the record. I'd support that. On your second, yes. Rider-facing transit technology should go through open, competitive processes. Sole-sourcing should be the documented exception, with the reason published. On your third, I'll give you a partial yes and I'd rather be straight about why. I support an open integration framework in principle, so that Ottawa builders can work with OC Transpo rather than around it. I won't commit to a framework that names a specific platform, including yours. You've made the case against the City choosing a vendor without an open process, and I think that case is right, which means I can't turn around and pick one myself before I've been elected or read the file. One caveat on all three. I haven't independently verified the contract figures or the STO comparison. I'm answering on the principle, and if the numbers turn out differently once I've checked them, I'll say so publicly. Yes to fifteen minutes. Send me some times. On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 9:51 PM Wyatt Baldwin · otranspo.ca < hello@otranspo.ca> wrote: > Dear Malloum Abakar, > > I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, > an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here > is the live transit scorecard for College: otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/8. > Right now it shows 79.6% of arrivals landing within five minutes of > schedule, graded route by route from OC Transpo's own settled arrivals over > the last fourteen days, next to a live map of the vehicles running through > the ward and a plain list of what would fix the worst of it. Use it at the > doors and in debates, no strings attached. > > Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to > $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one > contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, > $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in > 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all > sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never > went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's > all in the City's own contract disclosures: > > Transit contracts awarded under delegated authority (PDF) > <https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf> > > Contracts under delegation of authority, January 1 to June 30, 2025 (PDF) > <https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf> > > The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a > subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, > and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of > $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of > a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the > term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the > City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from > Ottawa's own riders. > > Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau > launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said > publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's > buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: Le Droit report > <https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e>). > What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's > own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced > rider surveys. > > Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent > scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at > otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and > breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with > real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City > nothing. > > Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is > trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that > it works. > > So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected: > > 1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app > contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and > performance, before it gets extended again. > > 2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology > going forward. > > 3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine > included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back > with the City. > > I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance > voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes > to show you or your team the platform. > > Respectfully, > Wyatt Baldwin > otranspo.ca > -- Abakar Malloum Candidate for City Council, Ward 8 (College) (343) 209-6100 · abakarmalloumcollege@gmail.com abakarmalloumcollege-ward.com

    Note at the writer’s request (28 September 2026): the phrase "approaching $700,000" repeats the figure in our letter of 9 September, which we have since corrected to $1,157,794. He asked that this be recorded here, and added that the corrected figure only strengthens the case for a public review.

    لطفاً این سابقه را بررسی کنید

    وضعیت انتشار: بدون تغییر منتشر شده

    منبع ذخیره‌شده با هش دریافت مطابقت دارد.

    شا-256 90644ee0db588b308f0cd4df58b83f93c46e53fbfb1cc812c3c45a47069a0af1

    پیوند به این پیام

  3. ایمیلی که فرستادیم

    Otranspo · فرستاده یا دریافت‌شده · نخستین انتشار

    A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Dear Malloum Abakar,

    Thank you for replying on September 13. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you.

    My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract

    You asked me to send some times for the fifteen minutes, and I haven't. I'm not going to squeeze it into the last four weeks of your campaign; advance voting is about to start and your time belongs to voters right now. After election day on October 26 the offer stands, elected or not, and I'll write to you then to find a time.

    As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, with my letter beside it. Yours is on file. If you'd rather your position were summarised than quoted, tell me by Wednesday, September 30 and I'll publish it without your words and note that you asked.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    لطفاً این سابقه را بررسی کنید

    وضعیت انتشار: بدون تغییر منتشر شده

    منبع ذخیره‌شده با هش دریافت مطابقت دارد.

    شا-256 f71fc4328bc0c2292d7068571454d15e86a2fdacefe6f4832569b8ce9332d04d

    پیوند به این پیام

جدول زمانی ارسال و پاسخ

وضعیت تحویل پست
ارسال شد؛ تحویل تأیید نشده است
وضعیت ثبت‌شده
9 سپتمبر 2026 ساعت 21:51 (‎−4 گرینویچ)
  1. ارسال شد؛ تحویل تأیید نشده است
  2. ایمیلی که فرستادیم · Otranspo
  3. ایمیل پاسخ · نوشته شده توسط آنان
  4. ارسال شد؛ تحویل تأیید نشده است
  5. ایمیلی که فرستادیم · Otranspo

سه چیزی که ما خواستیم

این برداشت از ما است و نقل قول نیست. سخنان خود آنان در ادامه آمده است و شما می‌توانید خودتان قضاوت کنید.

1 بررسی قرارداد
متعهد شدهYes: the contract should be reviewed in public at Transit Commission before it is extended, with the term, the pricing structure and what the City received on the record.
2 تدارکات باز
متعهد شدهYes: open, competitive processes, with sole-sourcing as the documented exception and the reason published.
3 باز کردن یکپارچه‌سازی
تعهد نسبیA partial yes by his own description: supports an open integration framework in principle and will not commit to one that names a specific platform. He added that he had not independently verified the figures and would say so publicly if they differed.

تغییرات این صفحه

  • 28 سپتمبر 2026Name corrected at his request on 28 September 2026: listed as Abakar Malloum, given name first. The permanent link to this entry is unchanged.به درخواست خودشان.
  • 28 سپتمبر 2026Note added at his request on 28 September 2026 beside the phrase "approaching $700,000" in his reply: that figure came from our letter of 9 September and has since been corrected to $1,157,794. He confirmed his answer is to be quoted as written.وضعیت انتشار تغییر کرد: بدون تغییر منتشر شده to بدون تغییر منتشر شدهپیام متأثربه درخواست خودشان.
  • 28 سپتمبر 2026Publication decision recorded 28 September 2026: the reply is published verbatim, released together with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa, the day advance voting starts, as the letter of 9 September said.وضعیت انتشار تغییر کرد: در انتظار بررسی تحریریه to بدون تغییر منتشر شدهپیام متأثر

اگر سابقه شما اینجا درج شده است

هر مورد باز می‌ماند. پاسخی که ماه‌ها بعد برسد نیز نشر می‌شود و صفحه نشان می‌دهد که بعد از نشر رسیده است، همراه با هر دو تاریخ. اگر در اینجا چیزی نادرست است، لطفاً برای ما بنویسید. اصلاح همراه با آنچه تغییر کرد و زمان آن نشر می‌شود. اگر شما پاسخ داده‌اید و نمی‌خواهید سخنان شما چاپ شود، لطفاً به ما بگویید. ما موقف شما را بدون متن شما نشر می‌کنیم و درخواست شما را ثبت می‌کنیم.

به ما بنویسید