본문으로 건너뛰기

운행

문제 신고

이 페이지는 특정 정류장, 노선, 역, 차량에 대한 것이 아니에요. 하나를 열면 신고에 그 이름이 들어가요. 또는 전체 신고를 이용하세요.

무슨 일이 있었나요
전체 신고 내용 계정이 필요 없어요

On time, 10월 1일 – 11월 2일: the share of arrivals within five minutes of the timetable, on conventional OC Transpo routes. Wards with too few readings are left blank, never shown as zero.

선거구
On time by ward · 10월 1일 to 11월 2일
<60%60–6566–7172–7778–8283+estimated
Inner-city wards 12 to 18

Wards · 10월 1일 to 11월 2일

Rideau-Jock is the least reliable ward, at 60%. 4 wards sit below 70%.

Ward median 78% · network 77%

On-time share at every stop in the ward, all routes. Each row opens that ward’s page and report card.

How we got this number

How we got this number

60%Explained

측정하는 내용

The share of buses that reached a stop on time. On time here means from one minute early to five minutes late at timing points, the OC Transpo window. A by-hour table may also show the share within five minutes of the times riders see. That is a different rule, named where it appears and explained there. Cancelled trips and trips that never came count as misses.

  • 측정됨We saw it happen.
  • 예상Modelled, shown with a range.
  • ExplainedHow it is worked out, in words.

정보의 출처

  • ExplainedOC Transpo and STO live bus positions
  • Explained게시된 시간표, 날짜 포함
  • ExplainedTrip outcomes: ran, cancelled, did not come

계산 방법

  1. We find when each bus actually reached each timing point, from where it was on the map.
  2. We compare that with the timetable and mark the visit on time, early or late.
  3. Trips that were cancelled or never came count as misses. Visits we saw too thinly to judge are left out, not guessed.
  4. The on-time share is the judged visits that were on time, divided by all judged visits plus the misses.

Worked example

Illustrative example, rounded

One stop, one weekday, ten scheduled trips. The numbers are made up to show the steps. They are not from a real day.

  • Reached the stop in the window정시7
  • Early or lateOutside the window2
  • 오지 않음Counts as a miss1
  • 정시7 of 10, about 70%

얼마나 확실한가요

This is measured, not modelled. It gets less certain when we saw few visits, and the page says how many were judged.

Limits, and what would change it

  • It is a share of visits, not of riders: a full peak bus and an empty one count the same.
  • Where buses were too far apart in our position data, we say so rather than guess.
  • Early counts as a miss because a rider who arrives on time can find the bus already gone. The rider rule on a by-hour table treats early and late alike.
Read the full method Check a number

Method version 1 · changed 2026년 10월 25일

정시
24 wards, worst first정렬정시

Data: JSONCSV/api/public/v1/ward-scorecards