跳到主要内容

服务

报告问题

此页面不是关于某个站点、线路、车站或车辆的。请打开其中一个,让报告写明它,或者使用完整报告。

发生了什么
完整报告 无需账户

Rideau-Rockcliffe

Peter J. Karwacki

已答复未计入时间

往来信函

已发布的信息和未公开回复的通知,按发送或收到的先后顺序排列。每份文件会单独显示首次发布日期。

  1. 我们发出的电子邮件

    Otranspo · 发送或接收 · 首次发布

    Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Dear Peter J. Karwacki,

    I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here is the live transit scorecard for Rideau-Rockcliffe: https://otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/13. Right now it shows 66.5% of arrivals landing within five minutes of schedule, graded route by route from OC Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, next to a live map of the vehicles running through the ward and a plain list of what would fix the worst of it. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings attached.

    Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's all in the City's own contract disclosures:

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf

    https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf

    The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from Ottawa's own riders.

    Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced rider surveys.

    Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at https://otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City nothing.

    Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that it works.

    So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected:

    1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and performance, before it gets extended again.

    2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology going forward.

    3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back with the City.

    I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes to show you or your team the platform.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    核对此记录

    发布状态: 原文发布

    存储的来源与导入时的哈希值一致。

    SHA-256 校验值 7205f53083c1261361a95994a3719ef175756f50d3f56c9ea3054e1304a7aa81

    此消息的链接

  2. 回复电子邮件

    由对方撰写 · 发送或接收 · 首次发布

    Re: Your ward's transit scorecard, and the $700K contract council never voted on

    Dear Wyatt, Thanks for writing, and for doing this the right way — sourced, dated, with the actual contract disclosures attached rather than just an accusation. That's rare, and it's exactly the kind of documentation I try to build my own posts around. On the substance: yes to all three, and I'll explain why rather than just checking boxes. On #1, a public Transit Commission review of contract 33523-92002-G01 before any extension: this is squarely the kind of thing that should never have avoided a council vote in the first place. A sole-source exception used once is a judgment call. Three sole-source payments to the same vendor over three years, totalling close to $700,000, with no public term or per-rider pricing attached to any of them, isn't an exception anymore, it's a pattern that delegated authority was never supposed to cover. I don't need to take your word for the STO comparison either — the fact that a neighbouring agency got the same core product for nothing is exactly the kind of baseline that should have been in front of whoever signed off on the Royale rollout. I'll commit to pushing for that review, and to asking publicly what the $180,000 actually bought: one year, multiple years, a flat fee, or something priced per subscriber. On #2, open and competitive processes for rider-facing transit tech going forward: agreed without qualification. This is the same argument I've made about 311 — the City keeps treating its own resident-facing data infrastructure as a one-off purchase instead of a piece of civic infrastructure that should be competitively and transparently sourced, then held to a measurable standard afterward. A subscription nobody can price is an output, not an outcome. On #3, an open partnership framework so platforms like yours can integrate and share data back with the City: I support the principle, and I'd want it built as an actual framework with clear technical and data-governance criteria, not a handshake deal with one vendor replacing another. The problem with 33523-92002-G01 wasn't that a private company was involved, it was that the terms were never public and never competed. Whatever comes next has to be open by design, or we've just moved the same failure mode onto a different platform. I'd take you up on the 15 minutes to see otranspo.ca directly, and I'll have a proper answer up before October 1st. In the meantime: yes, yes, and yes-with-the-framework-built-right. Sincerely, Peter Karwacki On Wed, Sep 9, 2026, 10:00 p.m. Wyatt Baldwin · otranspo.ca < hello@otranspo.ca> wrote: > Dear Peter J. Karwacki, > > I'm an Ottawa resident, a transit rider, and the builder of otranspo.ca, > an independent transit platform made in Ottawa. Before anything else, here > is the live transit scorecard for Rideau-Rockcliffe: > otranspo.ca/en/city/wards/13. Right now it shows 66.5% of arrivals > landing within five minutes of schedule, graded route by route from OC > Transpo's own settled arrivals over the last fourteen days, next to a live > map of the vehicles running through the ward and a plain list of what would > fix the worst of it. Use it at the doors and in debates, no strings > attached. > > Here is why I'm writing. Since 2023, the City has committed close to > $700,000 to the Montreal company that makes the Transit app, all on one > contract (33523-92002-G01). $282,000 for monitoring the real-time data, > $180,000 to roll out the free Royale subscription, and another $233,794 in > 2025 for rider surveys inside the app. There was no RFP, it was all > sole-sourced under an exception in the Procurement By-law, and it never > went to council for a vote, staff signed it under delegated authority. It's > all in the City's own contract disclosures: > > Transit contracts awarded under delegated authority (PDF) > <https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf> > > Contracts under delegation of authority, January 1 to June 30, 2025 (PDF) > <https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf> > > The disclosures also leave basic questions unanswered. Royale is a > subscription product, so is the $180,000 a one-time cost or an annual one, > and is it priced per rider or a flat fee? At Transit's advertised price of > $24.99 a year, $180,000 only covers about 7,200 subscriptions in a city of > a million people, and nobody can say what we actually bought because the > term and pricing were never made public. The 2025 payment also means the > City is paying a Montreal company to compile crowdsourced feedback from > Ottawa's own riders. > > Across the river, the STO gets the same app for free. When Gatineau > launched real-time tracking in Transit in 2019, the STO's president said > publicly that the partnership cost nothing, because showing an agency's > buses is Transit's free tier (Le Droit, Jan. 31, 2019: Le Droit report > <https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e>). > What Ottawa paid for is the extras, monitoring the quality of the City's > own data feed, sponsoring a premium subscription, and buying crowdsourced > rider surveys. > > Riders already get those extras free on otranspo.ca, with independent > scorecards for every ward, route and station, crowdsourced rider reports at > otranspo.ca/en/report where riders log the no-show buses, crowding and > breakdowns the official feed never records, and live tracking with > real-time traffic. There is nothing to subscribe to, and it costs the City > nothing. > > Ottawa already has the bones of a world class system. What we've lost is > trust, and residents need to see the system working, not just be told that > it works. > > So I'm asking you to commit to three things if you're elected: > > 1. A public review at Transit Commission of the sole-source Transit app > contract, including its full cost, term, pricing structure, and > performance, before it gets extended again. > > 2. Fair, open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology > going forward. > > 3. An open partnership framework so qualified Ottawa-built platforms, mine > included, can integrate with OC Transpo and share crowdsourced data back > with the City. > > I'm publishing every candidate's answer on otranspo.ca before advance > voting starts October 1, yes, no, or silence. I'd also welcome 15 minutes > to show you or your team the platform. > > Respectfully, > Wyatt Baldwin > otranspo.ca >

    核对此记录

    发布状态: 原文发布

    存储的来源与导入时的哈希值一致。

    SHA-256 校验值 8a04bd3c64b91aa6a7a9218195f3cfbcd11e0461e1a48a3a80641e310a889332

    此消息的链接

  3. 我们发出的电子邮件

    Otranspo · 发送或接收 · 首次发布

    A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Dear Peter J. Karwacki,

    Thank you for replying on September 10. Two things since, and one of them is a correction I owe you.

    My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract

    You said yes to the 15 minutes I offered, and I haven't booked it. I'm not going to squeeze it into the last four weeks of your campaign; advance voting is about to start and your time belongs to voters right now. After election day on October 26 the offer stands, elected or not, and I'll write to you then to find a time.

    As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October 1, the day advance voting starts, with my letter beside it. Yours is on file. If you'd rather your position were summarised than quoted, tell me by Wednesday, September 30 and I'll publish it without your words and note that you asked.

    Respectfully, Wyatt Baldwin otranspo.ca

    核对此记录

    发布状态: 原文发布

    存储的来源与导入时的哈希值一致。

    SHA-256 校验值 7cf6ff5bd823fbcea56debae9b9bb93852b57f21ba12a319ec3b3c103b72c30e

    此消息的链接

  4. 回复电子邮件

    由对方撰写 · 发送或接收 · 首次发布

    Re: A correction to my September 9 letter, and the 15 minutes I offered

    Voter engagement in Rideau Rockcliffe, home of the PM and governor general is very low. Peter On Mon, Sep 28, 2026, 11:51 p.m. Wyatt Baldwin · otranspo.ca < hello@otranspo.ca> wrote: > Dear Peter J. Karwacki, > > Thank you for replying on September 10. Two things since, and one of them > is a correction I owe you. > > My letter put the City's commitments on the Transit app contract > (33523-92002-G01) at close to $700,000. The correct figure is $1,157,794. I > left out a fourth line because I wasn't certain of the amount: a $462,000 > extension in the City's July to December 2024 disclosure, for the app plus > customer surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking. Jenna > Jessop, a candidate in Orléans West-Innes, read the disclosures herself and > asked me about it. She was right, and I'm grateful she raised it. The > corrected total, all four source lines and the revision record are on the > contract page: https://otranspo.ca/en/insights/transit-app-contract > > You said yes to the 15 minutes I offered, and I haven't booked it. I'm not > going to squeeze it into the last four weeks of your campaign; advance > voting is about to start and your time belongs to voters right now. After > election day on October 26 the offer stands, elected or not, and I'll write > to you then to find a time. > > As my letter said, every candidate's answer is published at > https://otranspo.ca/en/public-record/candidates-2026 on Thursday, October > 1, the day advance voting starts, with my letter beside it. Yours is on > file. If you'd rather your position were summarised than quoted, tell me by > Wednesday, September 30 and I'll publish it without your words and note > that you asked. > > Respectfully, > Wyatt Baldwin > otranspo.ca >

    核对此记录

    发布状态: 原文发布

    存储的来源与导入时的哈希值一致。

    SHA-256 校验值 cdac9bbe0b2963cffee2174d1c7acd0430dec5e34978c7f69d72e11686b048c0

    此消息的链接

发送和回复时间线

邮件发送状态
已发送;未确认送达
记录状态的日期
2026年9月9日 GMT-4 22:00
  1. 已发送;未确认送达
  2. 我们发出的电子邮件 · Otranspo
  3. 回复电子邮件 · 由对方撰写
  4. 已发送;未确认送达
  5. 我们发出的电子邮件 · Otranspo
  6. 回复电子邮件 · 由对方撰写

我们提出的三项请求

以下解读是我们自己的看法,不是引述。候选人本人的原话在下方,您可以自行判断。

1 合同审查
已承诺Committed, and argued the case: three sole-source payments to one vendor over three years is a pattern rather than an exception.
2 公开采购
已承诺Committed without conditions.
3 打开集成
已承诺Committed without conditions.

本页的更改

  • 2026年9月30日Publication decision recorded 30 September 2026: the reply is published verbatim, released together with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa, the day advance voting starts, as the letter of 9 September said.发布状态已更改: 待编辑审核 to 原文发布受影响的信息
  • 2026年9月28日Publication decision recorded 28 September 2026: the reply is published verbatim, released together with every other reply on 1 October 2026 at 07:00 Ottawa, the day advance voting starts, as the letter of 9 September said.发布状态已更改: 待编辑审核 to 原文发布受影响的信息

如果您的条目在此处

所有条目都保持公开。几个月后才收到的回复也会发布,页面会注明它是在发布之后收到的,并列出两个日期。如果这里有任何错误,请联系我们,更正会连同修改的内容和时间一起发布。如果您已回复,但不希望公开您的原话,请告诉我们。我们会发布您的立场,但不发布您的文字,并记录您提出了这一要求。

联系我们