Scheduled service and available evidence
Evidence period: Oct 28, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026
—
No retained notice returned; this does not prove zero cancellations.
0
0 of 10 trips with a usable feed window (0%) had no matching position.
These counts may overlap; do not add them. A missing position confirms neither cancellation nor a no-show.
10 with position · 0 to investigate · 5 excluded · 15 scheduled trips
Current feed. No explicit notice for this route in the current feed; this does not guarantee service. Observed: Nov 4, 2026, 8:24 p.m..
5 scheduled trips were excluded from the position check for feed or identity gaps.
Published position coverage: 10 / 15 (66.7%). This is not a delivered-service rate. 7 service days in this source.
Timetables retained before the service day: 7 / 7 requested days · 0 missing days.
Historical calculation: Nov 4, 2026, 7:09 p.m.
Method: explicit provider notices, archived trip windows and retained timetables. Predictions and positions alone do not prove that a bus ran or was missed.
Predictions against the timetable
No comparable percentage published
This service purpose needs a different method. A general percentage could give a misleading picture.
These are provider predictions, not independently measured arrivals. Missing evidence is not counted as on-time service.
Calculated: Nov 5, 2026
6 partial-capture days not counted.
The general hourly comparison is not suitable for this service purpose. Source records remain available.
Improvement or decline requires comparable periods. This single result cannot establish a trend.
Last 28 days, October 7, 2026 to November 3, 2026: 21 days counted.
2 days left out because the live feed was only partly recorded or its trip numbers did not match the timetable: October 8, 2026, October 12, 2026.
29% of back-to-back buses on this route arrived bunched together: 67 of 232 pairs checked at stops in the last 28 days. When buses bunch, the wait after them is usually longer.
20% of pairs (47) had a long gap: more than 1.75 times the planned wait between them.
| Giizhigad diba'iganan | Pairs checked | Bunched | Long gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morning rush (6 to 9 a.m.) | 232 | 29% (67) | 20% (47) |
Slowest: SAINT-RAYMOND/LOUISE-CAMPAGNA to de la CITÉ-DES-JEUNES/BÉDARD, 18.8 km/h actual against 16 km/h planned.
| Wendjibàyan | Ijayan | Aaniin epiichi-waasaag | Planned speed | Actual speed | Trips measured | Slow trips |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAINT-RAYMOND/LOUISE-CAMPAGNA | de la CITÉ-DES-JEUNES/BÉDARD | 2.7 km | 16 km/h | 18.8 km/h | 20 | 0% |
Bejiw madjàwin: 1.5 apì nawach kinwesh.
6 partial-capture days not counted.
No counted cancellations on this route in the last four weeks. Notices we could not check would be listed below.
Did not come (no bus seen, no notice), last 7 days: none of the trips we could check.
From the load level STO’s buses report, over the last eight weeks. A time is marked usually busy when at least half of the trips with a reading reached standing room or fuller.
| When this route is usually busy | Anokii-giizhigadoon | Samdi | Anamiegìjigad |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before 6 am | Not enough readings | Not enough readings | Not enough readings |
| 6 to 9 am | Usually busy50% of 40 trips | Not enough readings | Not enough readings |
| 9 am to 3 pm | Usually busy53.3% of 30 trips | Not enough readings | Not enough readings |
| 3 to 6 pm | Usually seats44.8% of 29 trips | Not enough readings | Not enough readings |
| 6 to 10 pm | Not enough readings | Not enough readings | Not enough readings |
| After 10 pm | Not enough readings | Not enough readings | Not enough readings |
Based on 56 computed days.
Route check
A short summary of what we know. We say so when we cannot answer a question.
Ishkwàdj ikidowin
We need to confirm how this service is meant to work before rating it.
Aaniin minik gikendaasowinan: Nàwaj minik
Based on 840 eligible provider predictions over 17 measured days, from Oct 6, 2026 to Nov 3, 2026.
Updated Nov 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m.
These are repeated prediction-to-timetable differences, not independently measured service failures. They use the same eligible predictions as the result above, but group by stop rather than hour, so the lists need not match line for line.
Maji-dibaiganan kàwin ozhibii'ànziwan. Ondji ow mìkana, mìnawa da-ganawàbandàn.
No current official notice matches this route.
Prediction differences by stop
We do not yet have enough route-by-stop history to name a recurring problem stop. Rider reports are used as leads, not proof.
Pàkinan pejig dibaigan ji-wàbandaman endaso-gìzhigad, odàbànag, àpì kàwin gegò gì-ayàsinog, odàbàn ishinikàzowinan, gaye kakina àjindàsowinan.
Ganawaabandan aanjichigewin
Ow ozhibiigan ijinàgwad noongom, kaye ijinàgwad kayàsh. Ow ozhibiigan ikido kà-inendjigàdeg. Kawin ondji-kikendàgwasinon kidji-ki-majàd odàbàn.
Current published schedule began November 2, 2026
Ningii-ganawaabandaamin nitam Ishkwaa-anami'e-giizhigad ishkwaa oshki-mazina'igan gii-maajitaamagak, miinawaa Ishkwaa-anami'e-giizhigad bezhig anami'e-giizhigad jibwaa. Gakina agindaasowinan onjimagadoon GTFS mazina'iganan gaa-ganawendamang, ezhinikaadegin dabazhish.
Bezhig gemaa nawaj giizhigad gaa-onaabanjigeyan, bakaan izhi-bimiwizhiwewag odaabaanag. Ganabaj anami'e-giizhigad gemaa wiikonge-giizhigad. Gaawiin iwe apane izhiwebasinoon.
Giizhigad gaa-andawaabanjigaadeg: October 26, 2026
Ozhibii'igan ezhinaagwak: 7692f9a7012f44e6 · 68840ddf-afaa-4cf4-9656-22afc030f92f
Giizhigad gaa-andawaabanjigaadeg: November 2, 2026
Operator calendar-date records: 1 added · 0 removed
Ozhibii'igan ezhinaagwak: 540f8e4e98d50320 · 7a8023af-fdc6-4276-bed6-2e3d7bd7bb74
We will compare settled arrivals for the 14 days before and after the change. We publish the comparison only after both sides have at least 7 service days and 200 arrivals.
Gaawiin onizhishinzinoon ji-dibaabandaming aaniin apii ge-dagoshing odaabaan omaa miikanaang, mii iw wenji-ani-anokiing owe miikana. Gidaa-waabandaanaawaa ezhi-agindamang ozhibii'iganan. Ningii-bi-baabii'aanaan dash bakaan ji-waabandamaang, mii iw dibaajimowin ge-ani-dazhindamang agaamiing.
Checksums let anyone verify which retained timetable produced the counts. A changed count does not identify a cause, cancellation, operator decision, or passenger impact.
No grade is shown until a purpose-specific completion and pickup measure is available.
The public feed does not provide dependable passenger counts or passed-up-rider events. A missing position does not by itself prove a cancellation, no-show, short turn or cause.
Provisional results, published evidence
An ordinary on-time grade is not appropriate for this service without checking its purpose. The route check above explains the pickup, community-service or event evidence needed. You can still inspect the recorded trips and data gaps below.
Evidence window: October 6, 2026 to November 3, 2026
10 / 15 scheduled trips published at least one position across 5 service days (66.7%).
This is not a confirmed no-show. A missing position can mean a cancelled or missed bus, but it can also mean an unassigned trip ID or an operator-feed gap. Otranspo publishes the gap because it matters to riders while keeping the conclusion honest.
Prediction check: the last eligible provider prediction no earlier than ten minutes before the scheduled arrival, counted once per trip, stop and scheduled Toronto calendar date. It is compared with the timetable, not an independently measured arrival. Trip-position check: the timetable kept before each service day, matched to recorded positions. Exact IDs are preferred; an OC timetable suffix is matched only to one trip on the same route and date with an overlapping time window. Missing timetables, ambiguous matches and feed gaps stay labelled; they are not confirmed no-shows. Sources and limitations.
Dated service
The timetable, notices and what the live feed says are shown apart. Seeing a bus on the map does not prove you can board it.
November 3, 2026 · 3 trips in the retained timetable · retained notices; capture coverage unverified
In short: 1 with a matched position · 0 with no matching position (to investigate) · 2 with an unknown outcome.