閱讀這封信背後的研究
使用方法
- 請將 [Candidate name]、[ward]、[Your name] 和 [Your ward] 換成您自己的資料。
- 請寄給在您選區參選的候選人,以及市長候選人。
- 市政選舉日是十月26日。提前投票從十月1日開始。
Subject
The CAD $1.16M Transit app contract disclosed under delegated authority. Where do you stand?
Letter
Dear [Candidate name], I'm a resident of [ward] and I vote. I'm writing about something I only recently learned, and I want to know where you stand before October 26. City of Ottawa delegated-contract disclosures list four entries under contract 33523-92002-G01, totalling CAD $1,157,794: $282,000 for monitoring the realtime data feed and $180,000 to deploy Transit App Royale in 2023, a $462,000 extension in late 2024 for the app, surveys, data-quality analysis and performance benchmarking, and a $233,794 extension in 2025 for Rate-My-Ride customer-experience monitoring. Each entry carries the City's noncompetitive rationale Section 22 (1) (D). The source rows are here: https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Document%201%20%E2%80%93%20Transit%20Contracts%20awarded%20under%20delegated%20authority%20for%20the%20per_AODA.pdf https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Awarded%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20for%20July%201%20and%20December%2031%202024-AODA.pdf https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/default/files/Contracts%20Under%20Delegation%20of%20Authority%20January%201%20to%20June%2030%202025-AODA.pdf The disclosure rows do not include the full contract, its start and end date, renewal options, unit pricing, service levels, performance results or a complete statement of deliverables. Without those records, residents cannot tell what period each amount buys, whether the Royale amount is one-time or recurring, or assess value per rider or per year. Across the river, the STO says it signed a 2019 partnership to share realtime rider information through Transit. A Le Droit report at launch described that partnership as costing the STO nothing (Jan. 31, 2019: https://ledroit.com/actualites/gatineau/sto-les-parcours-en-temps-reel-6ec8c8b15a3398d70012e209c2fcc63e). Those records do not establish that Gatineau received the same term, features, surveys, monitoring, subscription sponsorship or performance work disclosed by Ottawa, so this is regional context rather than a like-for-like price comparison. I'm not alleging that anyone broke a rule. I'm asking for enough public information and scrutiny to assess this delegated, noncompetitive procurement before it is extended again. Ottawa has the bones of a world class transit system. What we've lost is trust, and trust doesn't come from being told the system works, it comes from seeing it working. Spending like this, made quietly, doesn't help. So I'm asking you to commit to two things if you're elected: 1. Publication and review of the full contract at Transit Commission, including its current total value, term, pricing structure and performance, before it is extended again. 2. Open, competitive processes for rider-facing transit technology from now on. Please reply and tell me where you stand. Your answer will matter when I vote. [Your name] [Your ward]
關於這封信
這是根據所引用的揭露資料列所寫的可編輯居民信函範本。請先閱讀,替換每個預留位置,並決定其中兩項建議是否代表您自己的看法,再以您自己的名義寄出。
主要發現 · 已查證的事實. 信函保留文件記載的總額 CAD $1,157,794,指出缺漏的合約資訊,並將 STO 紀錄視為範圍不同。這是由 Otranspo 擬好的倡議信,並非已代您寄出的訊息。
- 最初發布
- 在已找回的發布證據中沒有記錄
- 最新實質更新
- 2026年9月10日 · letter-v2
- 作者
- Otranspo civic research
- 內容負責人
- Otranspo civic research
- 數據範圍
- 可編輯的居民信函,依據渥太華市針對合約 33523-92002-G01 的揭露資料列,以及另行界定範圍的 2019 年 STO 背景紀錄。