No 69 trips cancelled now · 1 did not run in NovemberCancellations →

Previous measure: 91.6% of arrivals were within five minutes of the timetable (18,013 arrivals over 22 days). The report card below uses the newer one-minute-early to five-minutes-late measure when it has readings.

STO ᐊᖁᑎᖓ 69: St-Louis

ᑐᕌᖓᔪᖅGD Jardins0 buses · boards at · under each stop: the next bus (live dot = live, grey = sched.)

Quai local de la GAPPE #51 min sched.
des FLANDRES/de PIEDMONT3 min sched.
des FLANDRES/de PICARDIE4 min sched.
de PROVENCE/de PICARDIE4 min sched.
PROVENCE/de NANTES5 min sched.
de PROVENCE/d'AUVERGNE6 min sched.
de BOULOGNE/de FONTAINEBLEAU6 min sched.
Av. GATINEAU/de BOULOGNE7 min sched.
Av. GATINEAU/DUCERRE8 min sched.
SAINT-LOUIS/Av. GATINEAU9 min sched.
SAINT-LOUIS/de NANTEL10 min sched.
SAINT-LOUIS/de NANTEL10 min sched.
SAINT-LOUIS/CARTIER11 min sched.
SAINT-LOUIS/du PONT ALONZO-WRIGHT12 min sched.
SAINT-LOUIS/LEBAUDY12 min sched.
SAINT-LOUIS/LEBAUDY13 min sched.
LEBAUDY/du PLATEAU-DU-RÉSERVOIR13 min sched.
le ROY/LEBEAUDY14 min sched.
le ROY/de la TERRASSE-DAVID EST14 min sched.
du SOMMELIER/ISSLER15 min sched.
du SOMMELIER/ISSLER15 min sched.
des ÉRABLES/des SUCRES16 min sched.
des ÉRABLES/SAINT-ALEXANDRE16 min sched.
des ÉRABLES/SAINT-ALEXANDRE17 min sched.
SUPER C18 min sched.
des GRANDS-JARDINS/de PORT-DANIEL21 min sched.
des GRANDS-JARDINS/de la POINTE-PELÉE21 min sched.
des GRANDS-JARDINS/de la POINTE-TAILLON (fin)22 min sched.

Scheduled service and available evidence

Did the scheduled service run?

Open dated evidence

Evidence period: Oct 28, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026

Scheduled trips with cancellation notices

—

No retained notice returned; this does not prove zero cancellations.

Trips needing investigation

1 of 223 trips with a usable feed window (0.4%) had no matching position.

These counts may overlap; do not add them. A missing position confirms neither cancellation nor a no-show.

222 with position · 1 to investigate · 47 excluded · 270 scheduled trips

Current feed. No explicit notice for this route in the current feed; this does not guarantee service. Observed: Nov 4, 2026, 1:26 p.m..

Coverage, exclusions and sources

0 of 11 endpoint departures scheduled in the next four hours carried an explicit cancellation at the last check.

47 scheduled trips were excluded from the position check for feed or identity gaps.

Published position coverage: 222 / 270 (82.2%). This is not a delivered-service rate. 7 service days in this source.

Timetables retained before the service day: 7 / 7 requested days · 0 missing days.

Historical calculation: Nov 4, 2026, 12:09 p.m.

Method: explicit provider notices, archived trip windows and retained timetables. Predictions and positions alone do not prove that a bus ran or was missed.

What does the evidence show?

Predictions against the timetable

91.6%

of eligible provider predictions were within five minutes of the timetable.

Predictions in the source: 18,013
Weekdays with evidence: 17
Evidence window: Oct 6, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026

The hours we have evidence for

0596% · 124 predictions · 6 days
0689% · 278 predictions · 7 days
0771% · 178 predictions · 6 days
0878% · 631 predictions · 10 days
0992% · 477 predictions · 11 days
1092% · 518 predictions · 11 days
1198% · 502 predictions · 11 days
1298% · 543 predictions · 12 days
1395% · 469 predictions · 11 days
1495% · 467 predictions · 13 days
1596% · 728 predictions · 12 days
1679% · 615 predictions · 12 days
1790% · 803 predictions · 12 days
1891% · 873 predictions · 11 days
1973% · 457 predictions · 10 days
2098% · 491 predictions · 10 days
2194% · 464 predictions · 10 days
2299% · 513 predictions · 10 days
2398% · 219 predictions · 9 days

Share of predictions within five minutes of the timetable. Only eligible hours are shown; an absent hour does not mean zero.

These are provider predictions, not independently measured arrivals. Missing evidence is not counted as on-time service.

Calculated: Nov 4, 2026

6 partial-capture days not counted.

What about time of day?

19 hourly cohorts meet the thresholds of 30 predictions and 5 service days. Hourly thresholds are assessed separately from the route-wide aggregate.

Improvement or decline requires comparable periods. This single result cannot establish a trend.

Explore the dated evidence Source of this result

Buses arriving bunched

Last 28 days, October 7, 2026 to November 3, 2026: 21 days counted.

2 days left out because the live feed was only partly recorded or its trip numbers did not match the timetable: October 8, 2026, October 12, 2026.

Values and interpretation

0% of back-to-back buses on this route arrived bunched together: 1 of 3,015 pairs checked at stops in the last 28 days. When buses bunch, the wait after them is usually longer.

0% of pairs (1) had a long gap: more than 1.75 times the planned wait between them.

Buses arriving bunched
ᐅᓪᓗᒥ ᐃᑲᕐᕋᖅ	Pairs checked	Bunched	Long gap
Morning rush (6 to 9 a.m.)	1,180	0% (1)	0% (1)
Midday (9 a.m. to 3 p.m.)	119	0% (0)	0% (0)
Afternoon rush (3 to 6 p.m.)	1,112	0% (0)	0% (0)
Evening (6 to 10 p.m.)	604	0% (0)	0% (0)

ᖃᓄᖅ ᐅᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᒻᒪᖔᑦ →How we got this numberBunching and slow spots on every route →

Where this route is slowest

Slowest: des GRANDS-JARDINS/de la POINTE-TAILLON to des ÉRABLES/SAINT-ALEXANDRE, 16.3 km/h actual against 22.4 km/h planned.

Where this route is slowest
ᐱᒋᐊᕐᕕᒃ	ᑐᕌᕐᕕᒃ	ᐅᖓᓯᒋᓂᖓ	Planned speed	Actual speed	Trips measured	Slow trips
des GRANDS-JARDINS/de la POINTE-TAILLON	des ÉRABLES/SAINT-ALEXANDRE	1.9 km	22.4 km/h	16.3 km/h	291	24%
Av. GATINEAU/SAINT-LOUIS	de PROVENCE/d'AUVERGNE	610 m	18.2 km/h	19.5 km/h	310	4%
des FLANDRES/de PIEDMONT	de PROVENCE/d'AUVERGNE	830 m	16.6 km/h	20.2 km/h	309	2%
de PROVENCE/d'AUVERGNE	des FLANDRES/de PIEDMONT	780 m	21.5 km/h	20.7 km/h	296	6%
de PROVENCE/d'AUVERGNE	SAINT-LOUIS/Av. GATINEAU	970 m	19.4 km/h	21.4 km/h	311	0%
des ÉRABLES/SAINT-ALEXANDRE	des GRANDS-JARDINS/de la POINTE-TAILLON (fin)	2.1 km	25.9 km/h	24.4 km/h	281	9%
des ÉRABLES/SAINT-ALEXANDRE	Av. GATINEAU/SAINT-LOUIS	3.8 km	25.9 km/h	25.1 km/h	296	1%
SAINT-LOUIS/Av. GATINEAU	des ÉRABLES/SAINT-ALEXANDRE	3.5 km	26.3 km/h	25.6 km/h	312	1%

A slow trip took at least 1.5 times the planned time.

ᖃᓄᖅ ᐅᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᒻᒪᖔᑦ →

Cancellations on this route

What these words mean →

6 partial-capture days not counted.

No counted cancellations on this route in the last four weeks. Notices we could not check would be listed below.

Did not come (no bus seen, no notice), last 7 days: 1 of 223 trips we could check.

When this route is usually busy

From the load level STO’s buses report, over the last eight weeks. A time is marked usually busy when at least half of the trips with a reading reached standing room or fuller.

No time of day was usually busy in the last eight weeks.

When this route is usually busy	ᐱᓇᓱᐊᕈᓰᑦ	ᓈᑦᓰᓈᕐᕕᒃᑯᑦ	ᓈᑦᑏᖑᔭᕐᓂ
Before 6 am	Usually seats0% of 31 trips	Not enough readings	Not enough readings
6 to 9 am	Usually seats0% of 228 trips	Usually seats0% of 14 trips	Usually seats0% of 14 trips
9 am to 3 pm	Usually seats0% of 398 trips	Usually seats0% of 87 trips	Usually seats0% of 91 trips
3 to 6 pm	Usually seats0.3% of 304 trips	Usually seats0% of 47 trips	Usually seats0% of 48 trips
6 to 10 pm	Usually seats0% of 276 trips	Usually seats0% of 63 trips	Usually seats0% of 56 trips
After 10 pm	Usually seats0% of 45 trips	Usually seats0% of 15 trips	Usually seats0% of 17 trips

Based on 56 computed days.

Source: the occupancy status in STO’s public real-time vehicle feed, which STO sets from each bus’s load sensor (seats available under 60% full, standing room under 90%, full above 90%).
Each trip counts once per time of day, at the highest load it reported.
Reports of an empty bus are left out, because older records could not tell an empty bus from one with no sensor.
A time of day needs at least 12 trips on at least 4 different days before anything is shown. Holidays are counted with their day of the week.

Open the dated prediction analysis

ᐃᓱᓕᑦᑎᓂᖅ

What this route needs

Median provider predictions are 3.6 min later than the timetable in 1 hours of the day.

Predictions near the start are about 3.3 min later than the timetable, with a similar difference near the end. This does not establish the cause.

07:00 has 71% of predictions within five minutes of the timetable, against 94% the rest of the day.

Next investigation: test terminal recovery and the preceding trip against operational records. Predictions alone do not establish the cause.

Final provider predictions within five minutes of the timetable, by hour, last 14 days, 19 hours with samples

00:00: not enough data
01:00: not enough data
02:00: not enough data
03:00: not enough data
04:00: not enough data
05:00: 96% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 124 predictions, typically 2.1 min late
06:00: 88.5% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 278 predictions, typically 2.1 min late
07:00: 71.3% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 178 predictions, typically 1.8 min late
08:00: 78.1% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 631 predictions, typically 1.4 min late
09:00: 91.8% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 477 predictions, typically 0.5 min late
10:00: 92.1% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 518 predictions, typically 1.2 min late
11:00: 98% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 502 predictions, typically 0.7 min late
12:00: 98.3% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 543 predictions, typically 0.5 min late
13:00: 94.9% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 469 predictions, typically 1.1 min late
14:00: 94.6% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 467 predictions, typically 1.1 min late
15:00: 95.7% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 728 predictions, typically 1.6 min late
16:00: 79.3% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 615 predictions, typically 2.5 min late
17:00: 89.5% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 803 predictions, typically 1.5 min late
18:00: 91.1% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 873 predictions, typically 1.8 min late
19:00: 73.1% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 457 predictions, typically 3.6 min late
20:00: 97.6% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 491 predictions, typically 0.6 min late
21:00: 93.8% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 464 predictions, typically 0.2 min late
22:00: 98.8% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 513 predictions, typically 0.1 min early
23:00: 97.7% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 219 predictions, typically 0.2 min early

90% or more of predictions within five minutes
80 to 90% of predictions within five minutes
under 80% of predictions within five minutes
not enough data

Findings
What	ᖃᖓ	ᐅᑦᑐᕋᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᖅ	Scenario or next investigation
ProblemPredictions later than timetable	19:00	3.6 min late	Recovery time at the terminal
ProblemOne hour has a lower prediction match	07:00	71%	Operations, not the timetable

Measurements

Predictions later than timetable · 19:00: Measured arrivals 457; Hours affected 1; Spread 4.1 min; Median delay 3.6 min; Suggested running time change 3.6 min
One hour has a lower prediction match · 07:00: ᐃᑲᕐᕋᖅ 07:00; ᐱᕕᒃᓴᖓᓂ 71.3%; Measured arrivals 178; Shortfall 22.5 pts; Route median on time 93.8%

Open history, reliability and route analysis

Route check

How route 69 has been running

A short summary of what we know. We say so when we cannot answer a question.

Bottom line

Provider predictions were usually close to schedule in this dated sample.

92 in 100 eligible predictions were within 5 minutes of the timetable · 18,013 predictions checked

Prediction sample size: Larger sample

Based on 18,013 eligible provider predictions over 22 measured days, from Oct 6, 2026 to Nov 3, 2026.

Updated Nov 4, 2026, 12:32 p.m.

Where and when did predictions differ repeatedly?

These are repeated prediction-to-timetable differences, not independently measured service failures. They use the same eligible predictions as the result above, but group by stop rather than hour, so the lists need not match line for line.

No repeated prediction-difference period has cleared the evidence threshold yet.

No current official notice matches this route.

Prediction differences by stop

Quai local de la GAPPE #5
61 in 100 eligible predictions differed from the timetable by more than 5 minutes (357 predictions over 24 days).
Open this stop

These are route-specific provider predictions compared with the timetable. They identify repeated prediction differences at a place and time, not measured arrivals or their cause.

Check every trip and date

Open a time period to see each service day, scheduled trip, feed gap, observed public vehicle ID, and the exact counts behind this summary.

What riders want to know

Is any trip cancelled right now?: 0 of 11Checks trips starting at route endpoints in the next 4 hours. This is not a historical cancellation rate.
Possible no-shows after checking feed gaps?: 1 of 223 checked trips need a closer look1 of 223 trips with enough public-feed evidence had no matching position over 7 days. 47 of 270 scheduled trips were excluded because the feed record was incomplete. These are cases to investigate, not confirmed no-shows.
How did provider predictions differ from the timetable?: At the 95th percentile, the predicted difference was 6.0 min (positive means later; negative means earlier)92 in 100 eligible provider predictions were within 5 minutes of the timetable; actual arrivals were not measured here.
What wait did provider predictions imply?: No route-level result meets the evidence threshold yet. This does not mean gaps did not happen.

ᐊᐅᓪᓚᖅᑕᕐᕕᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᕐᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᓂᖅ

ᓴᖅᑭᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᓪᓗᖏᑦ: ᓯᕗᓂᐊᓂ ᑭᖑᓂᐊᓂᓗ

ᐅᓇ ᒫᓐᓇ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎ ᓇᓪᓕᐅᓇᐃᓪᓗᒍ ᓯᕗᓪᓕᐅᔪᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒧᑦ. ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒥ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᕐᓂᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᓯᒪᔪᓂᒃ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᔪᑦ. ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᖅ ᐊᐅᓚᓚᐅᕐᓂᖓᓂᒃ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᖏᑦᑐᑦ.

Current published schedule began November 2, 2026

ᐅᓪᓗᖅ ᓂᕈᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᖅ ᐊᑐᓂ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᐃᑲᕐᕋᓂᓪᓗ ᓴᖅᑭᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᓂᑦ

ᑕᑯᓐᓇᕈᑦᑕᖅᐳᒍᑦ ᓯᕗᓪᓕᖅᐹᖅ ᓇᒡᒐᔾᔭᐅ ᓄᑖᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᑦ ᐱᒋᐊᓚᐅᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ. ᐊᒻᒪ ᓇᒡᒐᔾᔭᐅ ᐱᓇᓱᐊᕈᓯᕐᒥᒃ ᓯᕗᓂᐊᒍᑦ. ᓈᓴᐅᑎᑦ ᑕᒪᕐᒥᒃ ᐱᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᐱᑕᖃᕐᓂᐊᖅᑐᓂᑦ ᒐᕙᒪᐅᑉ GTFS ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᖏᓐᓂᑦ. ᐊᑎᖏᑦ ᐊᑖᓂ ᐃᓗᓕᖃᖅᑐᑦ.

ᐅᓪᓗᑦ ᓂᕈᐊᖅᓯᒪᔭᑎᑦ ᐊᑕᐅᓯᖅ ᐅᖓᑖᓄᓪᓗ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᖓ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᖅ. ᐅᓇ ᖁᕕᐊᓱᐊᕐᕕᐅᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ ᐊᔾᔨᐅᙱᑦᑐᒥᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᖃᕐᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᐱᔾᔪᑎᖃᖅᑐᖅ. ᐱᓇᓱᐊᕐᕕᐅᔪᓂ ᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᖓ ᐅᒃᓱᓂᖓᓂᒃ ᑐᑭᖃᙱᑦᑐᖅ.

ᓯᕗᓂᐊᓂ

ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᐅᑎᐅᑉ ᐅᓪᓗᖓ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᐊᖅᑕᐅᔪᖅ: October 26, 2026

ᐸᕐᓇᒃᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᐅᔪᑦ: 0
ᐊᔾᔨᒌᙱᑦᑐᑦ ᓄᖃᖅᑕᕝᕕᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒥ: 0
ᐊᔾᔨᒌᙱᑦᑐᑦ ᐊᖁᑎᑦ ᓴᖅᑭᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ: 0
ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᑲᕐᕋᖏᑦ, ᓴᖅᑭᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ: —–—

ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᒋᐊᕈᑎᖓ: 7692f9a7012f44e6 · 68840ddf-afaa-4cf4-9656-22afc030f92f

ᓄᑖᖅ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎ

ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᐅᑎᐅᑉ ᐅᓪᓗᖓ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᐊᖅᑕᐅᔪᖅ: November 2, 2026

ᐸᕐᓇᒃᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᐅᔪᑦ: 42
ᐊᔾᔨᒌᙱᑦᑐᑦ ᓄᖃᖅᑕᕝᕕᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒥ: 54
ᐊᔾᔨᒌᙱᑦᑐᑦ ᐊᖁᑎᑦ ᓴᖅᑭᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ: 2
ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᑲᕐᕋᖏᑦ, ᓴᖅᑭᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ: 05:37–23:31

Operator calendar-date records: 1 added · 0 removed

ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᒋᐊᕈᑎᖓ: 540f8e4e98d50320 · 7a8023af-fdc6-4276-bed6-2e3d7bd7bb74

ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᐅᑎᑦ ᐱᐅᓯᕚᓕᓚᐅᖅᐸᑦ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᕐᓂᐅᑉ ᑭᖑᓂᐊᒍᑦ?

ᑎᑭᓐᓂᖏᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐊᔾᔨᒌᙱᓐᓂᖏᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᐊᖅᐸᕗᑦ. 14 ᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᕐᓂᖓᑕ ᓯᕗᓂᖓᓂ ᑭᖑᓂᖓᓂᓗ. ᓴᖅᑭᑎᑦᑎᓂᐊᖅᐳᒍᑦ ᒪᕐᕉᒃ ᐱᑕᖃᓕᕋᐃᒐᒃ ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕐᕕᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᐅᓪᓗᓂᒃ 7 ᐅᖓᑖᓄᓪᓗ, ᑎᑭᓐᓂᕐᓂᓪᓗ 200 ᐅᖓᑖᓄᓪᓗ.

Still collecting: before has 9,899 arrivals over 13 days; after has 1,416 arrivals over 2 days. No improvement or decline is claimed yet.

Checksums let anyone verify which retained timetable produced the counts. A changed count does not identify a cause, cancellation, operator decision, or passenger impact.

How this route is judged: Regular all-stop route

We compare the last eligible provider prediction for each scheduled arrival with the official schedule. These are not independently measured arrivals. A result needs at least 200 eligible predictions. Within 5 minutes is the rider-facing target used here.

What this data cannot prove

The public feed does not provide dependable passenger counts or passed-up-rider events. A missing position does not by itself prove a cancellation, no-show, short turn or cause.

See the definitions, thresholds and evidence order

Official current feed: explicit cancellations, skipped stops and active notices.
Matched observations: vehicle positions and settled predictions tied to the official schedule.
Official timetable: what was planned, kept separate from what was observed.
Rider and operator reports: leads about routes, times and places to investigate, not numeric proof by themselves.

Provisional results, published evidence

How did predictions compare with the timetable?

Each hour compares the last eligible provider prediction for a scheduled arrival with the timetable. “Within 5 minutes” describes that prediction difference, not a measured arrival or proof that a bus ran.

Evidence window: October 6, 2026 to November 3, 2026

Within 5 minutes of schedule: 91.6%
Eligible predictions checked: 18,013
Weekdays with data: 17
95th-percentile predicted delay: 6 min late

Patterns by hour (19)

Patterns by hour (19)
ᐃᑲᕐᕋᖅ	ᐱᕕᒃᓴᖓᓂ	Median	95th percentile	ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᔾᔪᑎᑦ
05:00	96.0%	2.1 min late	4.8 min late	124 · 6 days
06:00	88.5%	2.1 min late	8.7 min late	278 · 7 days
07:00	71.3%	1.8 min late	9.4 min late	178 · 6 days
08:00	78.1%	1.4 min late	9.8 min late	631 · 10 days
09:00	91.8%	0.5 min late	6.5 min late	477 · 11 days
10:00	92.1%	1.2 min late	8.3 min late	518 · 11 days
11:00	98.0%	0.7 min late	3.8 min late	502 · 11 days
12:00	98.3%	0.5 min late	2.7 min late	543 · 12 days
13:00	94.9%	1.1 min late	4.7 min late	469 · 11 days
14:00	94.6%	1.1 min late	4.2 min late	467 · 13 days
15:00	95.7%	1.6 min late	4.7 min late	728 · 12 days
16:00	79.3%	2.5 min late	12.4 min late	615 · 12 days
17:00	89.5%	1.5 min late	6.3 min late	803 · 12 days
18:00	91.1%	1.8 min late	5.5 min late	873 · 11 days
19:00	73.1%	3.6 min late	7.7 min late	457 · 10 days
20:00	97.6%	0.6 min late	3.9 min late	491 · 10 days
21:00	93.8%	0.2 min late	2.9 min late	464 · 10 days
22:00	98.8%	0.1 min early	2.1 min late	513 · 10 days
23:00	97.7%	0.2 min early	2.5 min late	219 · 9 days

No repeated pattern below 70% is yet established across at least three service days.

Scheduled bus, but not observed in realtime

222 / 270 scheduled trips published at least one position across 5 service days (82.2%).

19:006 / 14 trips without a position57.1%
07:004 / 10 trips without a position60.0%
06:003 / 10 trips without a position70.0%
20:004 / 14 trips without a position71.4%
21:004 / 14 trips without a position71.4%
22:004 / 14 trips without a position71.4%

This is not a confirmed no-show. A missing position can mean a cancelled or missed bus, but it can also mean an unassigned trip ID or an operator-feed gap. Otranspo publishes the gap because it matters to riders while keeping the conclusion honest.

Prediction check: the last eligible provider prediction no earlier than ten minutes before the scheduled arrival, counted once per trip, stop and scheduled Toronto calendar date. It is compared with the timetable, not an independently measured arrival. Trip-position check: the timetable kept before each service day, matched to recorded positions. Exact IDs are preferred; an OC timetable suffix is matched only to one trip on the same route and date with an overlapping time window. Missing timetables, ambiguous matches and feed gaps stay labelled; they are not confirmed no-shows. Sources and limitations.

Dated service

Trips scheduled that day

The timetable, notices and what the live feed says are shown apart. Seeing a bus on the map does not prove you can board it.

Service day

November 3, 2026 November 2, 2026 November 1, 2026 October 31, 2026 October 30, 2026 October 29, 2026 October 28, 2026

November 3, 2026 · 42 trips in the retained timetable · retained notices; capture coverage unverified

In short: 33 with a matched position · 0 with no matching position (to investigate) · 9 with an unknown outcome.

05:37– 05:56
Trip sto:63296900Insufficient coverage or identity; outcome unknown
06:07– 06:26
Trip sto:63296901Insufficient coverage or identity; outcome unknown
06:37– 06:56
Trip sto:63296902Insufficient coverage or identity; outcome unknown
07:05– 07:27
Trip sto:63296903Insufficient coverage or identity; outcome unknown
07:41– 08:03
Trip sto:63296904Insufficient coverage or identity; outcome unknown
08:03– 08:22
Trip sto:63296905Insufficient coverage or identity; outcome unknown
08:27– 08:48
Trip sto:63296922Insufficient coverage or identity; outcome unknown
08:31– 08:50
Trip sto:63296906Insufficient coverage or identity; outcome unknown
08:49– 09:08
Trip sto:63296907Insufficient coverage or identity; outcome unknown
09:30– 09:51
Trip sto:63296923Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 9:20 a.m. EST / 9:47 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.
09:52– 10:11
Trip sto:63296908Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 9:50 a.m. EST / 10:10 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.
10:29– 10:50
Trip sto:63296924Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 10:29 a.m. EST / 10:48 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.

· Open all evidence for this day

ᑐᕌᕝᑦ

ᑖᓐᓇ ᐅᖃᐅᓯᒧᑦ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᓯᒪᔪᖅ ᑐᕌᕝᑦᐅᕗᖅ.

Help improve it

About 48% of this site is translated so far. The rest is shown in English.

Read this page in English

This translation is a draft.

This page is a machine draft in Inuktitut (ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᑦ), the language of the Inuit. It was prepared without review by its speakers, and is waiting for one. Speakers and the community are invited to correct it. We will replace it with their words. Ottawa is on the unceded territory of the Anishinabe Algonquin Nation.

Cette page est une ébauche automatique en inuktitut (ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᑦ), la langue des Inuits. Elle a été préparée sans révision par ses locuteurs, et attend l’un d’eux. Les locuteurs et la communauté sont invités à la corriger. Nous la remplacerons par leurs mots. Ottawa se trouve sur le territoire non cédé de la Nation algonquine anishinabe (Anishinabe Algonquin Nation).