Wà:s ne kahiatónhsera

Aioio'ténhsera

Sahró:ri tsi nahò:ten iah tekaié:ri

This page is not about one stop, route, station or vehicle. Open one to have the report name it, or use the full report.

Oh nahò:ten iahà:wen
Full report No account needed

Ward 23 · Ottawa · Councillor: Allan Hubley

Kanata South

Kanata South: 83.5% of predictions within five minutes.

Partial data · 2 days partly captured
Within five minutes
83.5%
Stops in the ward
274
Routes serving it
18
Cancelled trips
Not available yet
Not counted per ward yet

Where it is slowest

  • 80% and up 8
  • 60 to 80% 2
  • Under 60% 0
  • Too little data 8

Routes serving the ward, by their share of predictions within five minutes. Each route result covers the whole route.

Routes in this ward

Routes in this ward, least reliable first
OháhaWithin 5 minCancelledAkwé:kon ronnónhstats
11071.6%Iah tekahiá:tonteIah tekahiá:tonte
16377.8%Iah tekahiá:tonteIah tekahiá:tonte
16181.3%Iah tekahiá:tonteIah tekahiá:tonte
16882.7%Iah tekahiá:tonteIah tekahiá:tonte
16283.5%Iah tekahiá:tonteIah tekahiá:tonte
16584.0%Iah tekahiá:tonteIah tekahiá:tonte
6884.6%Iah tekahiá:tonteIah tekahiá:tonte
6186.3%Iah tekahiá:tonteIah tekahiá:tonte

Cancellations and crowding are not published per route yet. 8 routes with too little data or a different service purpose are left out.

All routes and their sources

One-page brief

A printable summary of this ward for council and community meetings, with the same numbers, the method in plain words and dated sources.

What can be verified in Kanata South?

Arrival predictions, the imported timetable and train notices. Each is shown with its own source.

Provider prediction agreement

83.5%

of eligible predictions within five minutes of schedule

How this compares
Rank 3 of 22 · median 78.4%

Service, per the imported timetable

Scheduled trips at ward stops
Not available yet
Ohahà:
18
Ne train lines
0

Kà:sere ó:nen kèn:'en

The live buses inside this boundary are on the Map tab.

Prediction measure, timetable inventory and methods

Service delivery · evidence state

Oct 28, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026

Cancellations at stops in this ward

Not publishable

No zero or missed trip is inferred when exact stop calls cannot be published.

Predictions at stops inside the ward

83.5% within five minutes of the timetable across 330,590 eligible final provider predictions and 20 weekdays. These are not verified physical arrivals.

Predictions do not prove physical arrival.

Routes to inspect

Oct 28, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026

If available, these are route-wide vehicle-position matches for routes serving the ward. They do not locate a missed trip inside this ward or prove a cancellation. Each comparison uses scheduled trips for that same route and window.

Scheduled calls, sources and limits

18 routes · 274 stops. Timetable inventory, not trips delivered.

Cancellations at stops in this ward

Local count unavailable

The exact stop-call lookup did not finish within this page’s time budget. No zero, cancellation, or missed call is inferred.

Ka' nikarihò:ten

What would fix transit here

Worked out from the routes that serve this ward. Each item names the route, when it happens, and what would change it.

6 of 10 show repeated provider predictions later than the timetable, consistent with a possible scheduled running-time shortfall. A scheduler should test that scenario against operations; labour, fleet, recovery and transfer impacts are not established here.

Worst here: route 110, predictions later than timetable 15:00 to 18:00, 3.8 min late.

Best here: route 67, predictions consistently close to timetable, 96%.

10 of 10 routes here had something measurable to report.

Arrivals within five minutes, by hour of day, across the 10 routes graded here, last 14 days
  1. 00:00: 93.2% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 5,654 predictions, typically 0.1 min late
  2. 01:00: 92.2% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 2,573 predictions, typically 0.6 min late
  3. 02:00: 84.7% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 1,565 predictions, typically 1.1 min late
  4. 03:00: 94.3% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 561 predictions, typically 0.7 min early
  5. 04:00: 93.3% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 2,350 predictions, typically 0.9 min late
  6. 05:00: 84.7% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 10,137 predictions, typically 1.1 min late
  7. 06:00: 91% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 19,367 predictions, typically 0.7 min late
  8. 07:00: 84.1% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 23,563 predictions, typically 1.7 min late
  9. 08:00: 77.9% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 22,823 predictions, typically 2 min late
  10. 09:00: 82.8% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 23,106 predictions, typically 1.5 min late
  11. 10:00: 85.5% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 22,988 predictions, typically 1.1 min late
  12. 11:00: 83.5% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 22,709 predictions, typically 1.2 min late
  13. 12:00: 84.1% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 22,983 predictions, typically 1.2 min late
  14. 13:00: 84.2% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 23,003 predictions, typically 1.4 min late
  15. 14:00: 81.8% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 22,624 predictions, typically 1.4 min late
  16. 15:00: 77.8% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 22,624 predictions, typically 1.9 min late
  17. 16:00: 72.5% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 23,549 predictions, typically 2.4 min late
  18. 17:00: 71% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 24,572 predictions, typically 2.5 min late
  19. 18:00: 74.6% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 24,909 predictions, typically 2 min late
  20. 19:00: 85.5% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 22,463 predictions, typically 1.1 min late
  21. 20:00: 86.1% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 19,944 predictions, typically 1.2 min late
  22. 21:00: 89.5% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 15,494 predictions, typically 1.1 min late
  23. 22:00: 90.9% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 11,770 predictions, typically 0.8 min late
  24. 23:00: 91.2% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 8,037 predictions, typically 0.2 min late
  • 90% or more of predictions within five minutes
  • 80 to 90% of predictions within five minutes
  • under 80% of predictions within five minutes
  • not enough data
Findings
WhatÓ:nenTewaterièn:tareScenario or next investigation
ProblemPredictions later than timetable1101681611631651626 routes15:00 to 18:00 … 15:003.8 min late … 3.5 min lateMore running time
StrengthPredictions consistently close to timetable671 routes05:00 to 22:0096%Keep what works
ProblemOne hour has a lower prediction match168163601621655 routes17:00 … 16:0056% … 64%Operations, not the timetable
ProblemPredictions earlier than timetable1101 routes21:001.6 min earlyLess running time, or holding points
StrengthObserved-position lower bound686116816116367601651629 routesAll measured hours100%Keep what works
CaveatCoverage gap1101 routesAll measured hours99%More observation, not a service change

How KANATA SOUTH is doing

These indicators separate repeated delay from changes in the operator's arrival predictions. They suggest questions for planners and operations staff. They do not show the cause. They do not prove when buses arrived. Each figure shows its route-hour sample.

Measured over 193 route-hours. 2 more were observed too thinly to count, and are excluded rather than assumed good.

Scheduling

Repeated late predictions can point to a timetable worth reviewing. Check actual arrival and dispatch records before deciding whether running time needs to change.

Who can fix it
A service planner
What it costs
Iah tewaterièn:tare tó: nikaná:ien tsi niió:re ahontkáhtho ne ká'sere, ne raotiio'te tánon ne ò:ia.

Tsi ní:ioht kahiatónhsera tánon tsi nihawen:'en iah teiotsén:ion

92.7%

Route-hours: median arrival prediction iáh énska minute early, iáh áhsen minutes late.

Route-hours with repeated late predictions

13of 193

Route-hours where the median eligible arrival prediction is at least three minutes late. Review running time against actual operating records.

Route hours with early predictions

1of 193

Route-hours where the median eligible arrival prediction is at least one minute early. This does not show that buses left early.

Typical predicted delay

3.5min

The typical median predicted delay in flagged route-hours. It is not a validated amount to add to the timetable.

Operations

Iah skátne tewaterièn:tare tsi nahò:ten tó: nikahá:wi ne ká'sere ienkahá:wi. Ensewatkáhtho tsi niiorihò:ten. Ne ká'sere tsi niiohà:te, ne ronterihwakhéhtha, ne ahontá:wen tánon ne tsi kahiatónhsera tsi nikahá:wi iaonteweien'tà:'on. Iah ne ne'ne tsi ienkahá:wi ne tsi ahontaterièn:tara'ne tsi nahò:ten ne rorihwatsíhston.

Who can fix it
Ne ronterihwaién:tas, ó:ni oháha
What it costs
Cost unavailable until the operational cause and remedy are established.

Prediction gap below twenty minutes

100%

Ne tsi niiohà:te tánon ne ora'shòn:'a tsi nahò:ten ne 95-percentile ne tsi ienkahá:wi ne ká'sere iah tewáhsen minits tsi nikaié:rite tsi nà:'a ne median.

Route-hours with wide prediction gaps

0of 193

Route-hours where the 95th-percentile eligible prediction is at least twenty minutes later than the median. The cause needs investigation.

Typical prediction gap

Not enough evidence this month to publish this indicator.

The usual gap between the 95th-percentile prediction and the median in flagged route-hours.

Service, per the imported timetable

Scheduled transit, provider prediction agreement with the timetable, and public services in this ward.

Provider prediction agreement

83.5% of eligible provider predictions were within five minutes of the timetable. 276,116 of 330,590 settled trip-stop predictions at stops inside this ward matched that range across 20 weekdays with feed evidence, from Oct 3, 2026 to Nov 3, 2026. These are provider predictions, not independently observed arrivals.

2 partial-capture days not counted.

Predictions within five minutes
276,116
Eligible trip-stop predictions
330,590
Observed days
20 weekdays

How this compares

Ranked 3 of 22 measured wards. 5.1 points above the city median of 78.4%.

Highest: ward 22 at 85.1%. Lowest: ward 21 at 60.3%.

Only wards whose evidence meets the publication threshold are ranked. Same window and same method for each.

Which routes need closer review

10 of the 18 routes serving this ward have enough provider-prediction evidence to compare. Lowest timetable agreement first.

  1. 110Open route
    71.6%Predictions within five minutes

    113,377 eligible predictions across the whole route

  2. 163Open route
    77.8%Predictions within five minutes

    57,175 eligible predictions across the whole route

  3. 161Open route
    81.3%Predictions within five minutes

    74,311 eligible predictions across the whole route

  4. 168Open route
    82.7%Predictions within five minutes

    110,481 eligible predictions across the whole route

  5. 162Open route
    83.5%Predictions within five minutes

    22,123 eligible predictions across the whole route

  6. 165Open route
    84.0%Predictions within five minutes

    17,846 eligible predictions across the whole route

  7. 68Open route
    84.6%Predictions within five minutes

    159,114 eligible predictions across the whole route

  8. 61Open route
    86.3%Predictions within five minutes

    131,703 eligible predictions across the whole route

  9. 60Open route
    87.5%Predictions within five minutes

    32,160 eligible predictions across the whole route

  10. 67Open route
    93.0%Predictions within five minutes

    33,418 eligible predictions across the whole route

8 more routes here are not ranked: school, express, shopper or event service, whose schedule result does not compare the same way.

Vehicle visibility to investigate

Vehicle visibility to investigate

The current summary uses seven days. For every route, you can also open yesterday, the last 7 days, or the last 30 days and inspect the day, scheduled trip, excluded feed gaps, and every observed public vehicle ID. An absence does not prove a vehicle fault or operator decision.

Routes serving the ward

18 scheduled routes

Map & current service

Current service inside this boundary

Scheduled lines, stops, and observed buses share one map. Select a route or vehicle for details.

Evidence & sources

Imported municipal polygon · 19 boundary vertices · City of Ottawa ward boundaries · imported Aug 4, 2026

━ 18 bus routes● 274 stops
Loading live feed

Public amenity record for this ward

Public washrooms and drinking water

Choose a category to check which location details are available.
Public washrooms (City data) 8

The public ward snapshot publishes the count but not the individual locations for this ward. No locations are being invented.

Drinking water (City data) 5

The public ward snapshot publishes the count but not the individual locations for this ward. No locations are being invented.

Rate or report an issue

Rider evidence

Community reports

Signals below are moderated community aggregates, not official operator notices or reliability scores.

You can report without signing in. Anonymous reports count a little less when we calculate public patterns. You can add an account after submitting.

Report a specific problem

Emergency: call 9-1-1. Check official OC Transpo or STO notices before travelling.

Civic evidence brief

The identity, boundary, contacts, service scope and evidence dates behind this ward report, kept together so the page can be cited without losing its qualifications.

Municipality
City of Ottawa, Ontario
Geographic unit
Official City of Ottawa municipal ward 23: KANATA SOUTH
Boundary and vintage
City ward layer · effective not published · imported August 4, 2026
Official civic contacts
  • Allan Hubley · Councillor · source check is older than the publication threshold · source checked August 4, 2026 · official City contact source
  • Mark Sutcliffe · Rakowá:nen · source check is older than the publication threshold · source checked August 4, 2026 · official City contact source
Relevant scheduled service
18 public route records with a stop inside this boundary · operators: OC Transpo
Transit evidence vintage
Timetable import: not published · reliability window: Oct 3, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026

A ward boundary, route inventory, destination list, population count or employment count supplies civic context. None of those values alone measures passenger demand, household trip effects, transfers or daily attendance.

Ottawa wards are municipal wards. They are not Gatineau electoral districts, and results from the two boundary systems are not interchangeable.

Evidence behind this pageOpen the definition, method, sources, dates, coverage, and known limits.

What is being shown

A ward-level inventory of scheduled transit, public washrooms, drinking-water locations, and eligible final OC Transpo provider predictions at stops inside the ward.

How it was produced

Current imported records are assigned by point-in-polygon to the sourced ward boundary. Reliability uses one eligible final provider prediction per trip, stop, and service date in the latest 28 completed service days. Within five minutes is measured against the timetable, not a physical arrival. Publication requires 20 weekdays with prediction evidence and 500 eligible predictions.

Evidence dates

Imported
Computed or assembled
Kén:k nikón
330,590 eligible settled provider predictions across 20 weekdays with prediction evidence support the reliability result.
Method or data version
ward-counts-v1 + ward-stop-settled-arrivals-purpose-aware-v3
Source checksum
ward-reliability:689beec2499cc982316c6b98f593c3b370971dfed20aaf08e6f5f417ded17a18

Tsi nón: ionkwaién:ta'

Limits to keep in mind

  • Counts describe the published inventory inside the boundary, not service quality or access from every address.
  • Reliability covers final OC Transpo provider predictions at geographically assigned stops; physical arrivals are not independently measured. Rail and trips without eligible prediction evidence are not represented.
  • An unavailable count remains unavailable. It is not changed to zero.
Suggest a factual correction
Tsi ní:ioht tsi iakwaié:ren

For each trip, stop and service date at stops inside the ward, we keep the last eligible OC Transpo prediction and compare it with the timetable. It counts as within five minutes when the two are no more than five minutes apart. This is not a physical arrival.

The window is the latest 28 completed service days. A result is published only with 20 weekdays of prediction evidence and 500 eligible predictions. Route results cover each whole route, not only the part inside the ward.

Read the full method

Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence – City of Ottawa.