ᓄᓇᙳᐊᖅ
Previous measure: 91.9% of arrivals were within five minutes of the timetable (2,369 arrivals over 18 days). The report card below uses the newer one-minute-early to five-minutes-late measure when it has readings.
30 ᐊᒻᒪ 31 ᒥᓂᑦ ᐊᑯᓐᓂᖓᓂ ᐊᑐᓂ
Scheduled service and available evidence
Evidence period: Oct 29, 2026 – Nov 4, 2026
0
Trips in the published timetable marked cancelled without qualifying later matching vehicle observations in our archive. This does not prove the trip did not operate. Not counted: 2 trips with qualifying later matching vehicle observations. Trips with any notice: 2.
1
1 of 60 trips with a usable feed window (1.7%) had no matching position.
These counts may overlap; do not add them. A missing position confirms neither cancellation nor a no-show.
59 with position · 1 to investigate · 0 excluded · 60 scheduled trips
Current feed. No explicit notice for this route in the current feed; this does not guarantee service. Observed: Nov 5, 2026, 5:59 a.m..
0 of 5 endpoint departures scheduled in the next four hours carried an explicit cancellation at the last check.
0 scheduled trips were excluded from the position check for feed or identity gaps.
Published position coverage: 59 / 60 (98.3%). This is not a delivered-service rate. 7 service days in this source.
Timetables retained before the service day: 7 / 7 requested days · 0 missing days.
Historical calculation: Nov 5, 2026, 4:38 a.m.
Method: explicit provider notices, archived trip windows and retained timetables. Predictions and positions alone do not prove that a bus ran or was missed.
Predictions against the timetable
91.9%
of eligible provider predictions were within five minutes of the timetable.
Share of predictions within five minutes of the timetable. Only eligible hours are shown; an absent hour does not mean zero.
These are provider predictions, not independently measured arrivals. Missing evidence is not counted as on-time service.
Calculated: Nov 5, 2026
2 partial-capture days not counted.
8 hourly cohorts meet the thresholds of 30 predictions and 5 service days. Hourly thresholds are assessed separately from the route-wide aggregate.
Improvement or decline requires comparable periods. This single result cannot establish a trend.
Last 28 days, October 8, 2026 to November 4, 2026: 25 days counted.
2 days left out because the live feed was only partly recorded or its trip numbers did not match the timetable: October 8, 2026, October 15, 2026.
0% of back-to-back buses on this route arrived bunched together: 3 of 1,202 pairs checked at stops in the last 28 days. When buses bunch, the wait after them is usually longer.
0% of pairs (0) had a long gap: more than 1.75 times the planned wait between them.
| ᐅᓪᓗᒥ ᐃᑲᕐᕋᖅ | Pairs checked | Bunched | Long gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morning rush (6 to 9 a.m.) | 626 | 0% (3) | 0% (0) |
| Afternoon rush (3 to 6 p.m.) | 240 | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
| Evening (6 to 10 p.m.) | 336 | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
Slowest: DUN SKIPPER / CEDAR CREEK to KELLY FARM / CRESTON VALLEY, 19.1 km/h actual against 18.7 km/h planned.
| ᐱᒋᐊᕐᕕᒃ | ᑐᕌᕐᕕᒃ | ᐅᖓᓯᒋᓂᖓ | Planned speed | Actual speed | Trips measured | Slow trips |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUN SKIPPER / CEDAR CREEK | KELLY FARM / CRESTON VALLEY | 1.9 km | 18.7 km/h | 19.1 km/h | 93 | 3% |
| LEITRIM B | KELLY FARM / WHITE ALDER | 2.5 km | 18.5 km/h | 23.9 km/h | 96 | 0% |
A slow trip took at least 1.5 times the planned time.
ᐋᑐᕚ ᓄᓇᓕᖓᑕ ᑐᓴᖅᑎᑦᑎᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᖁᑏᑦ ᓴᓇᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᒪᑐᑦᑕᐅᔪᓪᓗ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᓐᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ, ᑕᒪᑐᒪ ᐊᖁᑎᐅᑉ ᖃᓂᒋᔮᓂ. ᖃᓂᒋᔭᐅᓂᖓ ᓴᖅᑭᑦᑎᙱᑦᑐᖅ ᐸᔅ ᐊᓯᐊᒍᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᖓᓂᒃ. ᑕᒪᑐᒥᖓ ᖃᐅᔨᔪᒪᒍᕕᑦ, ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᐅᑉ ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᖏᑦ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᒋᑦ.
ᐊᖁᑎᒥᒃ ᓴᓇᔪᑦ
KELLY FARM between BRADWELL and SHEPODY
Oct 6, 2026, 12:00 a.m. to Nov 6, 2026, 5:00 p.m.
KELLY FARM off-peak lane reductions between BRADWELL and SHEPODY due to construction, from October 6th to November 6th.
ᓄᓇᓕᐅᑉ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔭᖓ ᐅᓇ ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᖅᑐᖅ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔾᔪᑎᓄᑦ.
about 0 m from the route
City record updated Oct 9, 2026, 7:36 a.m..
A route counts as near when its timetable path passes within 40 m of the City’s mapped closure; a stop counts when it is within 75 m.
ᐱᕝᕕᖓ: ᐋᑐᕚ ᓄᓇᓕᐊ, ᐊᖅᑯᑎᓂ ᐱᓇᓱᐊᕐᓂᐅᔪᑦ ᒪᑐᓯᒪᔪᓪᓗ. ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᔪᑦ Open Government Licence ᑯᑦ, ᐋᑐᕚ ᓄᓇᓕᐊ. ᓄᓇᓕᐊ ᐅᖃᖅᑐᖅ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐱᐅᓂᖅᐹᒥ ᐱᓇᓱᐊᕈᓯᐅᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ. ᐃᓘᓐᓇᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐃᓗᓕᖃᙱᓐᓇᔭᖅᑐᑦ. ᐋᑐᕚ ᓄᓈᓖᑦ ᐊᖅᑯᑏᑦ ᓄᓇᙳᐊᖓ ↗
2 partial-capture days not counted.
No counted cancellations on this route in the last four weeks. Notices we could not check would be listed below.
Did not come (no bus seen, no notice), last 7 days: 1 of 60 trips we could check.
ᐃᓱᓕᑦᑎᓂᖅ
Provider predictions are about 1.1 min earlier than the timetable, 18:00.
Only 98% of scheduled trips were seen; the rest are not counted as missed.
| What | ᖃᖓ | ᐅᑦᑐᕋᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᖅ | Scenario or next investigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProblemPredictions earlier than timetable | 18:00 | 1.1 min early | Less running time, or holding points |
| CaveatCoverage gap | All measured hours | 98% | More observation, not a service change |
Route check
A short summary of what we know. We say so when we cannot answer a question.
Bottom line
Dated result, not live service
This prediction-to-timetable result describes the dated period, not service right now. It was last calculated 3 hours ago. Current vehicle positions and official notices are checked separately.
92 in 100 eligible predictions were within 5 minutes of the timetable · 2,369 predictions checkedPrediction sample size: Larger sample
Based on 2,369 eligible provider predictions over 18 measured days, from Oct 6, 2026 to Nov 3, 2026.
Updated Nov 5, 2026, 2:32 a.m.
These are repeated prediction-to-timetable differences, not independently measured service failures. They use the same eligible predictions as the result above, but group by stop rather than hour, so the lists need not match line for line.
No repeated prediction-difference period has cleared the evidence threshold yet.
No current official notice matches this route.
Prediction differences by stop
We do not yet have enough route-by-stop history to name a recurring problem stop. Rider reports are used as leads, not proof.
Open a time period to see each service day, scheduled trip, feed gap, observed public vehicle ID, and the exact counts behind this summary.
ᐊᐅᓪᓚᖅᑕᕐᕕᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᕐᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᓂᖅ
ᐅᓇ ᒫᓐᓇ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎ ᓇᓪᓕᐅᓇᐃᓪᓗᒍ ᓯᕗᓪᓕᐅᔪᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒧᑦ. ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒥ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᕐᓂᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᓯᒪᔪᓂᒃ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᔪᑦ. ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᖅ ᐊᐅᓚᓚᐅᕐᓂᖓᓂᒃ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᖏᑦᑐᑦ.
Current published schedule began October 30, 2026
ᑕᑯᓐᓇᕈᑦᑕᖅᐳᒍᑦ ᓯᕗᓪᓕᖅᐹᖅ ᓇᒡᒐᔾᔭᐅ ᓄᑖᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᑦ ᐱᒋᐊᓚᐅᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ. ᐊᒻᒪ ᓇᒡᒐᔾᔭᐅ ᐱᓇᓱᐊᕈᓯᕐᒥᒃ ᓯᕗᓂᐊᒍᑦ. ᓈᓴᐅᑎᑦ ᑕᒪᕐᒥᒃ ᐱᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᐱᑕᖃᕐᓂᐊᖅᑐᓂᑦ ᒐᕙᒪᐅᑉ GTFS ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᖏᓐᓂᑦ. ᐊᑎᖏᑦ ᐊᑖᓂ ᐃᓗᓕᖃᖅᑐᑦ.
ᐅᓪᓗᑦ ᓂᕈᐊᖅᓯᒪᔭᑎᑦ ᐊᑕᐅᓯᖅ ᐅᖓᑖᓄᓪᓗ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᖓ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᖅ. ᐅᓇ ᖁᕕᐊᓱᐊᕐᕕᐅᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ ᐊᔾᔨᐅᙱᑦᑐᒥᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᖃᕐᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᐱᔾᔪᑎᖃᖅᑐᖅ. ᐱᓇᓱᐊᕐᕕᐅᔪᓂ ᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᖓ ᐅᒃᓱᓂᖓᓂᒃ ᑐᑭᖃᙱᑦᑐᖅ.
ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᐅᑎᐅᑉ ᐅᓪᓗᖓ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᐊᖅᑕᐅᔪᖅ: October 26, 2026
Operator calendar-date records: 0 added · 2 removed
ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᒋᐊᕈᑎᖓ: 1d13d0abb2506002 · 3932bee1-4577-4968-9a97-2987e88312ad
ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᐅᑎᐅᑉ ᐅᓪᓗᖓ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᐊᖅᑕᐅᔪᖅ: November 2, 2026
Operator calendar-date records: 0 added · 2 removed
ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᒋᐊᕈᑎᖓ: 91dd8e4251604344 · 6ee8491d-8f94-4122-a67b-ef228d9e0945
ᑎᑭᓐᓂᖏᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐊᔾᔨᒌᙱᓐᓂᖏᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᐊᖅᐸᕗᑦ. 14 ᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᕐᓂᖓᑕ ᓯᕗᓂᖓᓂ ᑭᖑᓂᖓᓂᓗ. ᓴᖅᑭᑎᑦᑎᓂᐊᖅᐳᒍᑦ ᒪᕐᕉᒃ ᐱᑕᖃᓕᕋᐃᒐᒃ ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕐᕕᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᐅᓪᓗᓂᒃ 7 ᐅᖓᑖᓄᓪᓗ, ᑎᑭᓐᓂᕐᓂᓪᓗ 200 ᐅᖓᑖᓄᓪᓗ.
Still collecting: before has 1,313 arrivals over 10 days; after has 518 arrivals over 4 days. No improvement or decline is claimed yet.
Checksums let anyone verify which retained timetable produced the counts. A changed count does not identify a cause, cancellation, operator decision, or passenger impact.
We compare the last eligible provider prediction for each scheduled arrival with the official schedule. These are not independently measured arrivals. A result needs at least 200 eligible predictions. Within 5 minutes is the rider-facing target used here.
The public feed does not provide dependable passenger counts or passed-up-rider events. A missing position does not by itself prove a cancellation, no-show, short turn or cause.
Provisional results, published evidence
Each hour compares the last eligible provider prediction for a scheduled arrival with the timetable. “Within 5 minutes” describes that prediction difference, not a measured arrival or proof that a bus ran.
Evidence window: October 6, 2026 to November 3, 2026
| ᐃᑲᕐᕋᖅ | ᐱᕕᒃᓴᖓᓂ | Median | 95th percentile | ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᔾᔪᑎᑦ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05:00 | 100.0% | 0 min late | 2 min late | 99 · 11 days |
| 06:00 | 90.3% | 0 min late | 6.8 min late | 165 · 11 days |
| 07:00 | 77.7% | 0.6 min late | 12.2 min late | 220 · 11 days |
| 08:00 | 73.9% | 1.7 min late | 15.6 min late | 176 · 11 days |
| 15:00 | 90.9% | 0.9 min late | 11.7 min late | 55 · 11 days |
| 16:00 | 91.3% | 0.3 min early | 15.7 min late | 241 · 11 days |
| 17:00 | 100.0% | 0.1 min early | 2.3 min late | 255 · 11 days |
| 18:00 | 100.0% | 1.1 min early | 1.4 min late | 231 · 11 days |
No repeated pattern below 70% is yet established across at least three service days.
59 / 60 scheduled trips published at least one position across 5 service days (98.3%).
This is not a confirmed no-show. A missing position can mean a cancelled or missed bus, but it can also mean an unassigned trip ID or an operator-feed gap. Otranspo publishes the gap because it matters to riders while keeping the conclusion honest.
Prediction check: the last eligible provider prediction no earlier than ten minutes before the scheduled arrival, counted once per trip, stop and scheduled Toronto calendar date. It is compared with the timetable, not an independently measured arrival. Trip-position check: the timetable kept before each service day, matched to recorded positions. Exact IDs are preferred; an OC timetable suffix is matched only to one trip on the same route and date with an overlapping time window. Missing timetables, ambiguous matches and feed gaps stay labelled; they are not confirmed no-shows. Sources and limitations.
Dated service
The timetable, notices and what the live feed says are shown apart. Seeing a bus on the map does not prove you can board it.
November 4, 2026 · 12 trips in the retained timetable · retained notices; capture coverage unverified
In short: 11 with a matched position · 1 with no matching position (to investigate) · 0 with an unknown outcome.