No 34 trips cancelled now · 2 did not run in NovemberCancellations →

Previous measure: 82% of arrivals were within five minutes of the timetable (66,687 arrivals over 27 days). The report card below uses the newer one-minute-early to five-minutes-late measure when it has readings.

ᐊᖁᑦ 34: Blair ⇄ Chapel Hill

ᑕᒪᑦ 30 ᒥᓂᑦᓂ

Scheduled service and available evidence

Did the scheduled service run?

Open dated evidence

Evidence period: Oct 29, 2026 – Nov 4, 2026

Scheduled trips with cancellation notices

Trips in the published timetable marked cancelled without qualifying later matching vehicle observations in our archive. This does not prove the trip did not operate. Not counted: 6 trips with qualifying later matching vehicle observations. Trips with any notice: 8.

Trips needing investigation

2 of 453 trips with a usable feed window (0.4%) had no matching position.

These counts may overlap; do not add them. A missing position confirms neither cancellation nor a no-show.

451 with position · 2 to investigate · 0 excluded · 453 scheduled trips

Current feed. No explicit notice for this route in the current feed; this does not guarantee service. Observed: Nov 5, 2026, 3:11 a.m..

Coverage, exclusions and sources

0 of 8 endpoint departures scheduled in the next four hours carried an explicit cancellation at the last check.

0 scheduled trips were excluded from the position check for feed or identity gaps.

Published position coverage: 451 / 453 (99.6%). This is not a delivered-service rate. 7 service days in this source.

Timetables retained before the service day: 7 / 7 requested days · 0 missing days.

Historical calculation: Nov 5, 2026, 2:08 a.m.

Method: explicit provider notices, archived trip windows and retained timetables. Predictions and positions alone do not prove that a bus ran or was missed.

What does the evidence show?

Predictions against the timetable

82%

of eligible provider predictions were within five minutes of the timetable.

Predictions in the source: 66,687
Weekdays with evidence: 19
Evidence window: Oct 6, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026

The hours we have evidence for

0595% · 847 predictions · 11 days
0696% · 1,813 predictions · 13 days
0782% · 2,520 predictions · 15 days
0860% · 2,496 predictions · 15 days
0981% · 2,296 predictions · 15 days
1082% · 2,357 predictions · 15 days
1193% · 2,361 predictions · 15 days
1291% · 2,348 predictions · 15 days
1385% · 2,345 predictions · 15 days
1478% · 2,763 predictions · 15 days
1581% · 3,192 predictions · 15 days
1669% · 2,467 predictions · 15 days
1778% · 2,357 predictions · 15 days
1884% · 2,243 predictions · 15 days
1996% · 2,086 predictions · 15 days
2096% · 1,777 predictions · 13 days
2161% · 1,556 predictions · 11 days
2269% · 263 predictions · 11 days

Share of predictions within five minutes of the timetable. Only eligible hours are shown; an absent hour does not mean zero.

These are provider predictions, not independently measured arrivals. Missing evidence is not counted as on-time service.

Calculated: Nov 5, 2026

2 partial-capture days not counted.

What about time of day?

18 hourly cohorts meet the thresholds of 30 predictions and 5 service days. Hourly thresholds are assessed separately from the route-wide aggregate.

Improvement or decline requires comparable periods. This single result cannot establish a trend.

Explore the dated evidence Source of this result

Buses arriving bunched

Last 28 days, October 8, 2026 to November 4, 2026: 25 days counted.

2 days left out because the live feed was only partly recorded or its trip numbers did not match the timetable: October 8, 2026, October 15, 2026.

Values and interpretation

1% of back-to-back buses on this route arrived bunched together: 252 of 46,659 pairs checked at stops in the last 28 days. When buses bunch, the wait after them is usually longer.

0% of pairs (224) had a long gap: more than 1.75 times the planned wait between them.

Buses arriving bunched
ᐅᓪᓗᒥ ᐃᑲᕐᕋᖅ	Pairs checked	Bunched	Long gap
Morning rush (6 to 9 a.m.)	5,488	1% (38)	1% (71)
Midday (9 a.m. to 3 p.m.)	20,891	1% (128)	1% (118)
Afternoon rush (3 to 6 p.m.)	11,097	1% (74)	0% (32)
Evening (6 to 10 p.m.)	9,169	0% (12)	0% (2)
Night (10 p.m. to 4 a.m.)	14	Not enough buses

ᖃᓄᖅ ᐅᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᒻᒪᖔᑦ →How we got this numberBunching and slow spots on every route →

Where this route is slowest

Slowest: CHAPEL HILL A to RENAUD / SADDLERIDGE, 11.2 km/h actual against 43.6 km/h planned.

Where this route is slowest
ᐱᒋᐊᕐᕕᒃ	ᑐᕌᕐᕕᒃ	ᐅᖓᓯᒋᓂᖓ	Planned speed	Actual speed	Trips measured	Slow trips
CHAPEL HILL A	RENAUD / SADDLERIDGE	730 m	43.6 km/h	11.2 km/h	46	93%
CHAPEL HILL A	RENAUD / SADDLERIDGE	730 m	14.2 km/h	11.6 km/h	89	13%
RENAUD / SADDLERIDGE	CHAPEL HILL B	2 km	15.6 km/h	17.3 km/h	749	2%
ORLÉANS / INNES	CHAPEL HILL A	2.1 km	18 km/h	19.4 km/h	792	1%
JEANNE D'ARC 1A	ORLÉANS / JEANNE D'ARC	3.3 km	31.6 km/h	21.4 km/h	724	47%
CHAPEL HILL B	ORLÉANS / INNES	2.1 km	23.6 km/h	23.2 km/h	758	2%
ORLÉANS / JEANNE D'ARC	JEANNE D'ARC 2A	3.1 km	34.7 km/h	24.7 km/h	728	32%
JEANNE D'ARC / BILBERRY	ORLÉANS / INNES	4.9 km	21.1 km/h	26 km/h	46	0%

A slow trip took at least 1.5 times the planned time.

ᖃᓄᖅ ᐅᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᒻᒪᖔᑦ →

ᓄᓇᓕᐅᑉ ᐊᖅᑯᑎᓂᒃ ᐱᓕᕆᓂᖓ ᐅᓇ ᐊᖅᑯᑎ ᖃᓂᒋᔮᓂ

ᐋᑐᕚ ᓄᓇᓕᖓᑕ ᑐᓴᖅᑎᑦᑎᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᖁᑏᑦ ᓴᓇᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᒪᑐᑦᑕᐅᔪᓪᓗ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᓐᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ, ᑕᒪᑐᒪ ᐊᖁᑎᐅᑉ ᖃᓂᒋᔮᓂ. ᖃᓂᒋᔭᐅᓂᖓ ᓴᖅᑭᑦᑎᙱᑦᑐᖅ ᐸᔅ ᐊᓯᐊᒍᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᖓᓂᒃ. ᑕᒪᑐᒥᖓ ᖃᐅᔨᔪᒪᒍᕕᑦ, ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᐅᑉ ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᖏᑦ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᒋᑦ.

ᐊᖁᑎᒥᒃ ᓴᓇᔪᑦ
Orléans Blvd between St-Joseph and Lumberman
Oct 26, 2026, 12:00 a.m. to Nov 20, 2026, 5:00 p.m.
Orléans Blvd off-peak lane reduction in both directions between St-Joseph and Lumberman due to construction, from October 26th to November 20th. Flagpersons present.
ᓄᓇᓕᐅᑉ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔭᖓ ᐅᓇ ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᖅᑐᖅ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔾᔪᑎᓄᑦ.
about 0 m from the route
City record updated Oct 26, 2026, 12:54 p.m..
ᐊᖁᑎᒥᒃ ᓴᓇᔪᑦ
Jeanne d'Arc between St-Joseph and Des Épinettes
Oct 26, 2026, 12:00 a.m. to Nov 20, 2026, 5:00 p.m.
Jeanne d'Arc off-peak lane reductions in both directions between St-Joseph and Des Épinettes due to construction, from October 26th to November 20th. Flagpersons present.
ᓄᓇᓕᐅᑉ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔭᖓ ᐅᓇ ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᖅᑐᖅ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔾᔪᑎᓄᑦ.
about 0 m from the route
City record updated Oct 26, 2026, 12:48 p.m..

A route counts as near when its timetable path passes within 40 m of the City’s mapped closure; a stop counts when it is within 75 m.

ᐱᕝᕕᖓ: ᐋᑐᕚ ᓄᓇᓕᐊ, ᐊᖅᑯᑎᓂ ᐱᓇᓱᐊᕐᓂᐅᔪᑦ ᒪᑐᓯᒪᔪᓪᓗ. ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᔪᑦ Open Government Licence ᑯᑦ, ᐋᑐᕚ ᓄᓇᓕᐊ. ᓄᓇᓕᐊ ᐅᖃᖅᑐᖅ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐱᐅᓂᖅᐹᒥ ᐱᓇᓱᐊᕈᓯᐅᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ. ᐃᓘᓐᓇᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐃᓗᓕᖃᙱᓐᓇᔭᖅᑐᑦ. ᐋᑐᕚ ᓄᓈᓖᑦ ᐊᖅᑯᑏᑦ ᓄᓇᙳᐊᖓ ↗

Cancellations on this route

What these words mean →

2 partial-capture days not counted.

7 scheduled trips with counted cancellation notices from Thu, Oct 8 to Wed, Nov 4.

Not counted: 13 trips with qualifying later matching vehicle observations and 1 for trips not in that day’s timetable.

Hours with the most cancellations: 7 a.m. (3), 1 p.m. (2), 10 a.m. (1)

Latest cancelled trips

Tue, Nov 3, scheduled 10:04
Mon, Nov 2, scheduled 13:33
Wed, Oct 28, scheduled 07:43
Tue, Oct 27, scheduled 14:22
Tue, Oct 27, scheduled 07:43

OC Transpo gives no reason for single trips, so none is shown.

Did not come (no bus seen, no notice), last 7 days: 2 of 453 trips we could check.

Open the dated prediction analysis

ᐃᓱᓕᑦᑎᓂᖅ

What this route needs

Median provider predictions are 3.5 min later than the timetable in 1 hours of the day.

08:00 has 60% of predictions within five minutes of the timetable, against 82% the rest of the day.

Matched public positions cover 100% of scheduled trips. This is a lower bound on operated service, not an audited delivery result.

Final provider predictions within five minutes of the timetable, by hour, last 14 days, 18 hours with samples

00:00: not enough data
01:00: not enough data
02:00: not enough data
03:00: not enough data
04:00: not enough data
05:00: 94.7% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 847 predictions, typically 0.6 min late
06:00: 96.2% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 1,813 predictions, typically 0.6 min early
07:00: 82.1% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 2,520 predictions, typically 0 min late
08:00: 60.2% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 2,496 predictions, typically 3 min late
09:00: 80.7% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 2,296 predictions, typically 1.3 min late
10:00: 82% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 2,357 predictions, typically 1.2 min late
11:00: 93.2% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 2,361 predictions, typically 0.8 min late
12:00: 90.9% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 2,348 predictions, typically 1.3 min late
13:00: 85.2% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 2,345 predictions, typically 2.1 min late
14:00: 77.9% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 2,763 predictions, typically 2.4 min late
15:00: 81.4% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 3,192 predictions, typically 1.6 min late
16:00: 69.2% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 2,467 predictions, typically 2.5 min late
17:00: 77.8% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 2,357 predictions, typically 1.4 min late
18:00: 84.2% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 2,243 predictions, typically 0.3 min late
19:00: 95.6% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 2,086 predictions, typically 0.1 min late
20:00: 95.8% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 1,777 predictions, typically 0.1 min early
21:00: 60.7% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 1,556 predictions, typically 3 min late
22:00: 68.8% of final predictions within five minutes of the timetable, 263 predictions, typically 3.5 min late
23:00: not enough data

90% or more of predictions within five minutes
80 to 90% of predictions within five minutes
under 80% of predictions within five minutes
not enough data

Findings
What	ᖃᖓ	ᐅᑦᑐᕋᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᖅ	Scenario or next investigation
ProblemPredictions later than timetable	22:00	3.5 min late	More running time
ProblemOne hour has a lower prediction match	08:00	60%	Operations, not the timetable
StrengthObserved-position lower bound	All measured hours	100%	Keep what works

Measurements

Predictions later than timetable · 22:00: Measured arrivals 263; Hours affected 1; Spread 4.3 min; Median delay 3.5 min; Suggested running time change 3.5 min
One hour has a lower prediction match · 08:00: ᐃᑲᕐᕋᖅ 08:00; ᐱᕕᒃᓴᖓᓂ 60.2%; Measured arrivals 2,496; Shortfall 21.8 pts; Route median on time 82.1%
Observed-position lower bound · All measured hours: ᑐᕌᒐᖅ 99.5%; Trips with a matching position 99.6%; ᐅᓪᓗᑦ ᐸᓯᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ 5; Trips with a matching position 451; ᐸᕐᓇᒃᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᐅᔪᑦ 453

Open history, reliability and route analysis

Route check

How route 34 has been running

A short summary of what we know. We say so when we cannot answer a question.

Bottom line

Provider predictions were usually close to schedule, but check the problem times below.

82 in 100 eligible predictions were within 5 minutes of the timetable · 66,687 predictions checked

Prediction sample size: Larger sample

Based on 66,687 eligible provider predictions over 27 measured days, from Oct 6, 2026 to Nov 3, 2026.

Updated Nov 5, 2026, 2:32 a.m.

Where and when did predictions differ repeatedly?

These are repeated prediction-to-timetable differences, not independently measured service failures. They use the same eligible predictions as the result above, but group by stop rather than hour, so the lists need not match line for line.

08–09: 40 in 100 eligible predictions differed from the timetable by more than 5 minutes (2,496 predictions over 15 days).
21–22: 39 in 100 eligible predictions differed from the timetable by more than 5 minutes (1,556 predictions over 11 days).
22–23: 31 in 100 eligible predictions differed from the timetable by more than 5 minutes (263 predictions over 11 days).
16–17: 31 in 100 eligible predictions differed from the timetable by more than 5 minutes (2,467 predictions over 15 days).

No current official notice matches this route.

Prediction differences by stop

ST. MATTHEW H.S.
80 in 100 eligible predictions differed from the timetable by more than 5 minutes (60 predictions over 20 days).
Open this stop
JEANNE D'ARC / MILLWOOD
35 in 100 eligible predictions differed from the timetable by more than 5 minutes (60 predictions over 20 days).
Open this stop
JEANNE D'ARC 2A
34 in 100 eligible predictions differed from the timetable by more than 5 minutes (855 predictions over 29 days).
Open this stop
FORTUNE / ST AGATHE
33 in 100 eligible predictions differed from the timetable by more than 5 minutes (856 predictions over 29 days).
Open this stop

These are route-specific provider predictions compared with the timetable. They identify repeated prediction differences at a place and time, not measured arrivals or their cause.

Check every trip and date

Open a time period to see each service day, scheduled trip, feed gap, observed public vehicle ID, and the exact counts behind this summary.

What riders want to know

Is any trip cancelled right now?: 0 of 8Checks trips starting at route endpoints in the next 4 hours. This is not a historical cancellation rate.
Possible no-shows after checking feed gaps?: 2 of 453 checked trips need a closer look2 of 453 trips with enough public-feed evidence had no matching position over 7 days. 0 of 453 scheduled trips were excluded because the feed record was incomplete. These are cases to investigate, not confirmed no-shows.
How did provider predictions differ from the timetable?: At the 95th percentile, the predicted difference was 9.6 min (positive means later; negative means earlier)82 in 100 eligible provider predictions were within 5 minutes of the timetable; actual arrivals were not measured here.
What wait did provider predictions imply?: 10.7 min average predicted wait0.7 min less than the scheduled wait, based on 2,175 eligible predictions at 31 stop hours across 14 service days.

ᐊᐅᓪᓚᖅᑕᕐᕕᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᕐᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᓂᖅ

ᓴᖅᑭᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᓪᓗᖏᑦ: ᓯᕗᓂᐊᓂ ᑭᖑᓂᐊᓂᓗ

ᐅᓇ ᒫᓐᓇ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎ ᓇᓪᓕᐅᓇᐃᓪᓗᒍ ᓯᕗᓪᓕᐅᔪᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒧᑦ. ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒥ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᕐᓂᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᓯᒪᔪᓂᒃ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᔪᑦ. ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᖅ ᐊᐅᓚᓚᐅᕐᓂᖓᓂᒃ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᖏᑦᑐᑦ.

Current published schedule began October 30, 2026

ᐅᓪᓗᖅ ᓂᕈᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᖅ ᐊᑐᓂ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᐃᑲᕐᕋᓂᓪᓗ ᓴᖅᑭᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᓂᑦ

ᑕᑯᓐᓇᕈᑦᑕᖅᐳᒍᑦ ᓯᕗᓪᓕᖅᐹᖅ ᓇᒡᒐᔾᔭᐅ ᓄᑖᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᑦ ᐱᒋᐊᓚᐅᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ. ᐊᒻᒪ ᓇᒡᒐᔾᔭᐅ ᐱᓇᓱᐊᕈᓯᕐᒥᒃ ᓯᕗᓂᐊᒍᑦ. ᓈᓴᐅᑎᑦ ᑕᒪᕐᒥᒃ ᐱᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᐱᑕᖃᕐᓂᐊᖅᑐᓂᑦ ᒐᕙᒪᐅᑉ GTFS ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᖏᓐᓂᑦ. ᐊᑎᖏᑦ ᐊᑖᓂ ᐃᓗᓕᖃᖅᑐᑦ.

ᐅᓪᓗᑦ ᓂᕈᐊᖅᓯᒪᔭᑎᑦ ᐊᑕᐅᓯᖅ ᐅᖓᑖᓄᓪᓗ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᖓ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᖅ. ᐅᓇ ᖁᕕᐊᓱᐊᕐᕕᐅᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ ᐊᔾᔨᐅᙱᑦᑐᒥᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᖃᕐᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᐱᔾᔪᑎᖃᖅᑐᖅ. ᐱᓇᓱᐊᕐᕕᐅᔪᓂ ᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᖓ ᐅᒃᓱᓂᖓᓂᒃ ᑐᑭᖃᙱᑦᑐᖅ.

ᓯᕗᓂᐊᓂ

ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᐅᑎᐅᑉ ᐅᓪᓗᖓ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᐊᖅᑕᐅᔪᖅ: October 26, 2026

ᐸᕐᓇᒃᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᐅᔪᑦ: 72
ᐊᔾᔨᒌᙱᑦᑐᑦ ᓄᖃᖅᑕᕝᕕᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒥ: 89
ᐊᔾᔨᒌᙱᑦᑐᑦ ᐊᖁᑎᑦ ᓴᖅᑭᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ: 7
ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᑲᕐᕋᖏᑦ, ᓴᖅᑭᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ: 05:29–22:14

Operator calendar-date records: 0 added · 2 removed

ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᒋᐊᕈᑎᖓ: 1d13d0abb2506002 · 3932bee1-4577-4968-9a97-2987e88312ad

ᓄᑖᖅ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎ

ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᐅᑎᐅᑉ ᐅᓪᓗᖓ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᐊᖅᑕᐅᔪᖅ: November 2, 2026

ᐸᕐᓇᒃᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᐅᔪᑦ: 72
ᐊᔾᔨᒌᙱᑦᑐᑦ ᓄᖃᖅᑕᕝᕕᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒥ: 89
ᐊᔾᔨᒌᙱᑦᑐᑦ ᐊᖁᑎᑦ ᓴᖅᑭᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ: 7
ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᑲᕐᕋᖏᑦ, ᓴᖅᑭᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ: 05:29–22:14

Operator calendar-date records: 0 added · 2 removed

ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᒋᐊᕈᑎᖓ: 91dd8e4251604344 · 6ee8491d-8f94-4122-a67b-ef228d9e0945

ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᐅᑎᑦ ᐱᐅᓯᕚᓕᓚᐅᖅᐸᑦ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᕐᓂᐅᑉ ᑭᖑᓂᐊᒍᑦ?

ᑎᑭᓐᓂᖏᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐊᔾᔨᒌᙱᓐᓂᖏᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᐊᖅᐸᕗᑦ. 14 ᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᕐᓂᖓᑕ ᓯᕗᓂᖓᓂ ᑭᖑᓂᖓᓂᓗ. ᓴᖅᑭᑎᑦᑎᓂᐊᖅᐳᒍᑦ ᒪᕐᕉᒃ ᐱᑕᖃᓕᕋᐃᒐᒃ ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕐᕕᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᐅᓪᓗᓂᒃ 7 ᐅᖓᑖᓄᓪᓗ, ᑎᑭᓐᓂᕐᓂᓪᓗ 200 ᐅᖓᑖᓄᓪᓗ.

Still collecting: before has 35,202 arrivals over 14 days; after has 14,852 arrivals over 6 days. No improvement or decline is claimed yet.

Checksums let anyone verify which retained timetable produced the counts. A changed count does not identify a cause, cancellation, operator decision, or passenger impact.

How this route is judged: Regular all-stop route

We compare the last eligible provider prediction for each scheduled arrival with the official schedule. These are not independently measured arrivals. A result needs at least 200 eligible predictions. Within 5 minutes is the rider-facing target used here.

What this data cannot prove

The public feed does not provide dependable passenger counts or passed-up-rider events. A missing position does not by itself prove a cancellation, no-show, short turn or cause.

See the definitions, thresholds and evidence order

Official current feed: explicit cancellations, skipped stops and active notices.
Matched observations: vehicle positions and settled predictions tied to the official schedule.
Official timetable: what was planned, kept separate from what was observed.
Rider and operator reports: leads about routes, times and places to investigate, not numeric proof by themselves.

Provisional results, published evidence

How did predictions compare with the timetable?

Each hour compares the last eligible provider prediction for a scheduled arrival with the timetable. “Within 5 minutes” describes that prediction difference, not a measured arrival or proof that a bus ran.

Evidence window: October 6, 2026 to November 3, 2026

Within 5 minutes of schedule: 82.0%
Eligible predictions checked: 66,687
Weekdays with data: 19
95th-percentile predicted delay: 9.6 min late

Patterns by hour (18)

Patterns by hour (18)
ᐃᑲᕐᕋᖅ	ᐱᕕᒃᓴᖓᓂ	Median	95th percentile	ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᔾᔪᑎᑦ
05:00	94.7%	0.6 min late	5.3 min late	847 · 11 days
06:00	96.2%	0.6 min early	2.8 min late	1,813 · 13 days
07:00	82.1%	0 min late	8.1 min late	2,520 · 15 days
08:00	60.2%	3 min late	18.3 min late	2,496 · 15 days
09:00	80.7%	1.3 min late	17.1 min late	2,296 · 15 days
10:00	82.0%	1.2 min late	9.2 min late	2,357 · 15 days
11:00	93.2%	0.8 min late	5.6 min late	2,361 · 15 days
12:00	90.9%	1.3 min late	6.2 min late	2,348 · 15 days
13:00	85.2%	2.1 min late	9.3 min late	2,345 · 15 days
14:00	77.9%	2.4 min late	10 min late	2,763 · 15 days
15:00	81.4%	1.6 min late	7.3 min late	3,192 · 15 days
16:00	69.2%	2.5 min late	10.9 min late	2,467 · 15 days
17:00	77.8%	1.4 min late	8.7 min late	2,357 · 15 days
18:00	84.2%	0.3 min late	6.5 min late	2,243 · 15 days
19:00	95.6%	0.1 min late	4.7 min late	2,086 · 15 days
20:00	95.8%	0.1 min early	4.8 min late	1,777 · 13 days
21:00	60.7%	3 min late	10 min late	1,556 · 11 days
22:00	68.8%	3.5 min late	7.8 min late	263 · 11 days

4 hourly block(s) are below 70% across at least three service days: a repeated pattern, not one bad day.

Scheduled bus, but not observed in realtime

451 / 453 scheduled trips published at least one position across 5 service days (99.6%).

06:001 / 22 trips without a position95.5%
07:001 / 34 trips without a position97.1%
05:000 / 10 trips without a position100.0%
08:000 / 26 trips without a position100.0%
09:000 / 27 trips without a position100.0%
10:000 / 28 trips without a position100.0%

This is not a confirmed no-show. A missing position can mean a cancelled or missed bus, but it can also mean an unassigned trip ID or an operator-feed gap. Otranspo publishes the gap because it matters to riders while keeping the conclusion honest.

Prediction check: the last eligible provider prediction no earlier than ten minutes before the scheduled arrival, counted once per trip, stop and scheduled Toronto calendar date. It is compared with the timetable, not an independently measured arrival. Trip-position check: the timetable kept before each service day, matched to recorded positions. Exact IDs are preferred; an OC timetable suffix is matched only to one trip on the same route and date with an overlapping time window. Missing timetables, ambiguous matches and feed gaps stay labelled; they are not confirmed no-shows. Sources and limitations.

Dated service

Trips scheduled that day

The timetable, notices and what the live feed says are shown apart. Seeing a bus on the map does not prove you can board it.

Service day

November 4, 2026 November 3, 2026 November 2, 2026 November 1, 2026 October 31, 2026 October 30, 2026 October 29, 2026

November 4, 2026 · 72 trips in the retained timetable · retained notices; capture coverage unverified

In short: 72 with a matched position · 0 with no matching position (to investigate) · 0 with an unknown outcome.

05:29– 06:05
Trip 13907040Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 5:08 a.m. EST / 6:11 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.
05:34– 06:05
Trip 31436040Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 5:29 a.m. EST / 6:57 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.
06:04– 06:35
Trip 14941040Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 5:58 a.m. EST / 6:32 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.
06:05– 06:40
Trip 4616040Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 5:39 a.m. EST / 6:54 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.
06:32– 07:05
Trip 35736040Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 6:27 a.m. EST / 7:02 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.
06:35– 07:14
Trip 17123040Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 6:34 a.m. EST / 7:23 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.
07:00– 07:33
Trip 34999040Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 6:55 a.m. EST / 7:34 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.
07:05– 07:45
Trip 22511040Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 7:04 a.m. EST / 7:41 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.
07:28– 08:05
Trip 32080040Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 7:24 a.m. EST / 8:01 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.
07:33– 08:11
Trip 26494040Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 7:35 a.m. EST / 8:18 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.
07:43– 08:10
Trip 1253040Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 7:22 a.m. EST / 8:19 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.
07:43– 08:10
Trip 36372040Vehicle position matchedFirst / last feed position: 7:30 a.m. EST / 8:22 a.m. EST; not actual start or end times.

· Open all evidence for this day

ᑐᕌᕝᑦ

ᑖᓐᓇ ᐅᖃᐅᓯᒧᑦ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᓯᒪᔪᖅ ᑐᕌᕝᑦᐅᕗᖅ.

Help improve it

About 48% of this site is translated so far. The rest is shown in English.

Read this page in English

This translation is a draft.

This page is a machine draft in Inuktitut (ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᑦ), the language of the Inuit. It was prepared without review by its speakers, and is waiting for one. Speakers and the community are invited to correct it. We will replace it with their words. Ottawa is on the unceded territory of the Anishinabe Algonquin Nation.

Cette page est une ébauche automatique en inuktitut (ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᑦ), la langue des Inuits. Elle a été préparée sans révision par ses locuteurs, et attend l’un d’eux. Les locuteurs et la communauté sont invités à la corriger. Nous la remplacerons par leurs mots. Ottawa se trouve sur le territoire non cédé de la Nation algonquine anishinabe (Anishinabe Algonquin Nation).